>>8162802
>Red-pill
Go back to your containment board, retard. Nothing can be gained by educating you.

>>8162802
It can't be used for communication of information because the information is already effectively and transmitted when the systems interact before they are separated.

In some sense it's like taking two boxes, putting a red ball in one and a blue ball in the other, moving them apart, opening one to find a red ball and then knowing that the other one has the blue ball. You can't communicate with that.

>>8162841
The cat is definitely 100% dead if thats anything poisonous in that open flask. Doesnt really matter if its spilled on the floor or just leaking through the opening.

>>8162868
except that's exactly what it's not. it has been proven that the particles to not carry information with them. otherwise no spooky action would be necessary anyway.

>>8162816
This.

Fuck off. Sage

This thread has a good discussion about the most interesting FTL information transmission experiment https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/variation-on-dopfer-experiment-why-wont-this-work.226548/

>>8162868
Only if you don't take the formalism as a literal description of what's occurring when quantum objects are not being observed, which is a ludicrous suggestion considering we can observe the interference pattern of a wavefunction in a double slit experiment

>>8162802
The information communicated is random. The only "spooky action" is that the two sets of random data will be exactly complementary. I suppose you could use it to let two parties simultaneously learn the result of a random dice roll FTL.

>>8162802
Suppose you had 2 particles in unknown states, but they are entangled and some distance apart. You got 1 and I got 1.
If I measure my the state of my particle it's wavefunction will collapse into, let's say state a, and the wavefunction of your partile will collapse into state b.
The same thing will happen, if you measure your particle.
Now when you do a mesurement to determine the state of your particle, how would you know that it was my measurement and not yours, that collapsed the wave function of both particles? - Ergo you will not be able to tell if I am actually communicating with you or not.

>>8162802
Ignoring the dumbfuck SJWtard shitposters.

Spooky action at distance is usually a misunderstood concept. The particle spins do not collapse until they are observed, so you can't specify the information of the other particle when you measure it, you can only find out what it was.

Check out this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvK-od647c