ITT: Tell OP why he's fucking retarded
>Space-time is curved
>In some places, it's infinitely curved
>These areas are what's known as black holes
>To an observer far enough away from a black holes influence, one appears the relative focal point
>The relative focal point as seen from the center of a black hole differs dramatically
>Any amount of space away from them, the observer actually perceives a relative difference in time, limited by the speed at which information can travel
>To us, and our relative frame of reference here on earth, far distant galaxies appear far older
>To someone on the edge of an event horizon, we would appear far older
>Information cannot physically travel to or from either observer about the state of the other.
>>8160781
>In some places, it's infinitely curved
Until now I thought anything smaller than Planck length suddenly didn't make any sense - time and space drop entirely there.
>>8160819
Doesn't the asymptotic behavior imply infinity tho?
>>8160834
>imply
It shouldn't be about implication, it should be about proof.
>>8160839
You're absolutely right
I was just thinking along the threads of bottom of page 88 onward
https://books.google.com/books?id=-yQXwhE6iWMC&pg=PP1&dq=Carl+M+Bender+inauthor:Carl+inauthor:M+inauthor:Bender&lr=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&as_brr=0&cd=1#v=onepage&q&f=false
>>8160867
Fair point, I see where you're coming from.
>>8160877
And thank you for not calling me autistic.
Btw, what I meant was
>To two observers far enough away from a black holes influence, space appears flat (identical time/information conditions)
Space would also appear flat between two observers simultaneously entering a black hole. That is until infinitely acted upon by this constraining factor that effectively destroys information.
>>8160781
What is singularity exactly? Is it everything just compacted into a single point?
>>8160908
Don't want to say spacial singularity (the universe before the big bang had non-zero, non-infinite size)
I think it acts infinitely dense in the fact that it can not get more dense, minus the radiated radiation (from fission? iunno)
So it's not a singularity in the spacial dimension, but rather the time dimension (without real values in this dimension dynamic information cannot exist)
Are you popsci brainlets really just going on and on by yourselves? The fuck is wrong with all of you?
>>8160781
>In some places, it's infinitely curved
[citation needed]
The point of the singularities in GR isn't to imply that infinity can exist. They show us where and how GR breaks down.
Give me experimental proof of infinite curvature and then maybe GR will be correct about black holes.
>>8160819
>Planck length
Have you even looked up the wikipedia article for this? It's just a unit of length. There's no evidence for or against the discretization of spacetime, and even if there were the Planck length wouldn't have much to do with it besides being near the ballpark order of magnitude.
Also while I'm being triggered, stop equating spacetime with the space and time that we live in. They're not the same thing, spacetime is an abstract affine space -- a convenient mathematical construct.
>>8160908
>>8160918
what in the FUCK are you talking about
God when will we have a real theory of quantum gravity (that isn't hurr 69 dimensions) so we can dispense with singularity memes.
>>8160781
>Tell OP why he's fucking retarded
He believed in relativistic metaphysics
We live in a flat universe.
0 = H^2 - 8 πG/3 ρc
Space-time is not infinitely curved.
Where did you get this information?
