What are your thoughts on global warming?
The scientific evidence indicates that global warming is real, undesirable and is caused by human activity, but since I'm posting on a neo-Nazi website for low-functioning teenagers I'm obligated to say that it's a conspiracy by the Chinese to destroy the white race.
All the thoughts have bled from me and I can think no more.
Now it's climate change and not global warming, you silly
The climate changers are becoming desperate.
LIBRUL CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!
>>8160150
I find it hilarious that not a single global temperature data coming from an instutituon matches with any others chart. Global warming cult have become a meme long time ago also theyve been repeating the same thing for literally more than 20 years and everything stays the same.
>>8160163
>everything stays the same
you don't actually believe this do you?
Liberal cuck scientest are paid off by their kike overlords to fabricate data that shows global warming - whoops, "climate change" now, since its obvious the globe isn't getting warmer, in order to destroy western economies and civilization. You'd have to be deulsional to be lieve its real with all the evidence it isn't happening and zero evidence it is.
/thread
>>8160212
I think we are approaching maximum poe's law
>>8160071
Is it real? Yes
Is it "Apocalypse Now!" bad like Gore thinks? No
>>8160081
>muh white race extinction
>muh human race extinction
you know realize environmentalists are as paranoid and delusional as neonazis.
Is "I don't know" a valid answer? It seems that the earth has been cyclically heating and cooling since basically forever, and I do not believe that humans as a species have been able to monitor and record temperature long enough to have anything better than a wild guess.
I'll get back to you when people have recorded a few thousand years worth of temperature data.
>>8160071
>pl enrich me with your scientific thoughts, regarding global warming
here you go
What are your thoughts on theory of evolution? What are your thoughts on theory of gravity? I can go on and on, but you see why our thoughts on global warming are irrelevant, right?
There is a scientific consensus that humans are main contributor to global warming, which is real and serious.
>>8160071
>What are your thoughts on global warming?
A non-problem for idiots to feel guilty over. But not guilty enough to prevent them from driving and buying smart phones.
well, every month being the warmest on record for a while now is pretty scary if i'm honest
the mainstream narrative of it is just fantasy
The focus on co2 comes from the socialist need to be authoritarians
And they've been outright faking data for the last 20 years because reality doesn't line up with their bogus models/agendas
The global warming lie is a big part of the progressive agenda towards ever bigger government
>>8160800
What about the millions of dollars Exxon Mobil is putting into anti environmentalist propaganda?
>>8160847
Lol, everyone who doesn't swallow the lie has just been convinced by "propaganda." Right. Go suck Bernout's shiverlled old jewdick, shill.
>>8160847
good for them
what about the numerous industries that exist solely because of that lie?
>>8160708
>every month being the warmest on record for a while now is pretty scary if i'm honest
Was just a retarded headline. Not even NOAA agrees with that,
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/
>>8160081
This
g-gas the jews race war NOW!
>>8160150
for the sake of argument lets assume that carbon emissions won't cause massive climate change. Regardless of that, having more carbon in the air will increase ocean acidity, and kill pretty much every living thing in the ocean. So we dont even need to wait for our emissions to kill us through heat, we'll just lose all life in our oceans!
>>8161195
>having more carbon in the air will increase ocean acidity, and kill pretty much every living thing in the ocean.
Nah. Ocean acidity is more complex than that. Also, CO2 levels have been very much higher without dissolving everything in the ocean.
At any point when someone suggests a single-pivot disaster you can be pretty sure that he's full of shit and uses moron-tier modelling/assumptions about linearity.
>>8160212
>Last two years were the hottest on record since the 1800's
>Might be the hottest year this year too
>Nothing is happening guys!
Global Warming is much more impressive when you start at the Little Ice Age.
>>8160367
Don't know who told you that, but it wasn't a climatologist.
Human race extinction won't happen due to global warming in the short (<1000 years) term if at all.
In the short term you should expect economic damage of about 20 percent global gdp in the next 100 years (US had something like 80 percent fall during the great depression and survived "just fine").
You understand why that's undesirable, though, I'm sure.
Here is a nice educational video, I recommend the entire series by him.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNgqv4yVyDw&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=31
>>8161571
>Last two years were the hottest on record since the 1800's
>>8161571
Most 'normal' deniers have moved on from "it's not happening" to "it's not caused by humans". Of course on 4chan we get the crazies rather than well-functioning people.
>>8160071
My thoughts? I think any person who draws a conclusion to one way or another is a) gullible sheep b) naive as fuck or c) a complete retard.
Assuming you understand perfectly earth-scale thermodynamics with thousands of significant variables (pro tip: no one does), feel free to spend few years attempting to reach any logical conclusion or writing an algorithm that could convince me of your case... atleast you got some datasets to work with http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/paleoclimatology-data/datasets/climate-forcing
Alternatively we could just wait if any of the current "greenhouse gas" models produce ACTUAL quantifiable results... assuming nature doesnt throw a spanner in our works with a major volcanic eruption or something similar.
>>8161910
>Assuming you understand perfectly earth-scale thermodynamics with thousands of significant variables (pro tip: no one does),
>I don't understand climatology, therefore climatologists don't understand climatology.
Okay.
>Alternatively we could just wait if any of the current "greenhouse gas" models produce ACTUAL quantifiable results
We already did that.
They did.
Now what?
