Which one is most likely to be true as far as results in relativistic physics are concerned?
>>8140458
eternalism.
>>8140458
Possiblism
>>8140458
>nowism
>>8140458
Eternalism can offer an explanation for delayed choice quantum eraser experiments, so that's what my guess would be.
More like wibbly-woobley timey wimey ... stuff.
>>8140458
Presentism is absurd and free will is incompatible with the eternalist Universe so possibilist Universe is the one.
>>8140633
>free will is incompatible with the eternalist Universe
Not valid reasoning.
>>8140633
there is no free will if you only consider relativity.
>>8140646
>valid
Which one out of five laws of logic I am violating?
>>8140665
well first of all you don't use any of those laws to be able to claim "free will" is incompatible with "eternalist universe".
Why don't you show us your reasoning and we'll see if it makes sense.
>>8140665
You havent given any reason to assume free will exists
>>8140665
>assuming that free will exists
>>8140458
Special-relativistic physics makes the most sense in a block universe, because it lacks any meaningfully-defined single "present", or indeed a specific "time" axis. Each observer's "present" is a slice cut across the block, which can be cut at a different angle relative to others.
>>8141995
said otherwise: observers don't agree on the order of events.
Which kind of means the past, present and future have to be already existing (at least up to a certain point).
Thinking in terms of time is really a bad habit anyway.
Total randomness.
