Is deceleration a meme?
>>8133812
>Religion
Above 110
>>8133855
nicely meme'd friend
>>8133812
Religion is higher than psychology? What the fuck?
>>8133971
you think that thinking about abstract stuff like religion attracts dumber people than psychology???
>>8133855
Theology is a branch of philosophy, you will note philosophy is third highest
My IQ is below 100 and I'm a math grad.
>>8133812
physics masterace checking in
>>8133971
This graph is probably talking about the study of religion, not necessarily the practice of religion.
>>8134590
it is easier to study texts than actually be more ascetics than the hedonists today who do anything to sustain more hedonism
>>8134590
Most scientists believe in God or a higher power anyway.
>>8133812
Data was collected by a philosopher.
Somehow I did expect that.
>>8134604
I didn't realize that barely above/bellow 50% counted as "most".
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
Although you could say that the percentage of religious scientists is significantly higher in developing countries/third world shitholes, and significantly lower in developed first world countries.
http://news.rice.edu/2015/12/03/first-worldwide-survey-of-religion-and-science-no-not-all-scientists-are-atheists/
>>8134617
Yes, "most" is synonymous with "majority." 50% or more is the legal definition of a "majority."
>>8133855
Checkd
>GRE scores
>intended major
Only prospective grad students take the GRE, and you don't have a major (let alone an intended one) in grad school. This data seems to be representative only of grad students. hat would explain how it's all above the global average of 100, but it still is probably all bullshit.
>>8133991
Hmm. Theology is the study of a non-existent sky fairy, and philosophy is actual reasoning.
Which is better?
>>8134743
>non-existent sky fairy
As opposed to an existent sky fairy?
Anyway, theology is great if you want to, you know, have a greater understanding of the past 2000 years of Western civilization. The greatest painters, scientists, novelists, philosophers, etc were influenced by Christianity in some way.
Also, to call the Christian God a sky fairy shows an ignorance of theology and the intellectual understanding of God.
http://www.catholic.com/magazine/articles/aquinas-proves-atheists-are-closer-to-god-than-they-think
>>8134662
You're being too nitpicky. It's what they're going to study in grad school, generally.
http://www.statisticbrain.com/iq-estimates-by-intended-college-major/
>>8134753
[math]\text{Theology} \in \text{History}\times\text{Philosophy}[/math]
>>8133855
Read Summa Theologica before posting here again.
>>8133971
Most protestant preachers don't have graduate degrees in religious studies or theology. The idiots you see aren't the ones with a degree.
>>8133994
impossible
>>8135244
this ^^^^^^
>>8135207
Not him, but:
It's not impossible at all. I remember last year we had a thread about a physics major in a top school who was about to graduate and he was worried about jobs because his IQ was close to 100 or something like that. Hard work goes a long way anon.
>>8133991
except philosophy is not solely based on false assumptions and just fallacy all around
>>8135244
wow anon, perfect fucking way to describe any religion -- fallacy / ideological bias
I completely forgot about those words
>>8135244
>>8135253
A huge percentage of the world's is completely brainwashed by religion and that is somehow not worth studying?
Do you think religion scholars are just studying to become better Christians? Use your brain.
>>8135258
>>8135244
samefag
>>8135274
yes both posts are me
so what? your point?
am I not allowed to debate with 2 people at the same time?
>>8135272
Yeah but the amount of people that fit that description, that are doing that for the reason you stated make the minority not majority.
And by minority I mean, really low percentage, undoubtedly.
>>8135258
*tips*
The Bible is the only truth.
>>8133812
>average IQ estimated by average GRE scores
What kind of bullshit is this?
>>8135314
you have just been babmoozled m8
>>8135308
go back to /b/ with your fedora memes you disgusting animal
>>8135272
>Do you think religion scholars are just studying to become better Christians?
That's like giving a task that requires you to explain how your tooth disappears when you put it under your pillow, to a little girl that believes in a tooth fairy.
Get the point?
>>8135354
Can you learn English first before posting?
>>8135314
Yeah, why not just write "Average GRE score"
>>8135358
Can you fuck off?
When you become polyglot, then comment on how bad my English is.
>Where did I even make a mistake?
>>8133812
>tfw mum is a social worker
You're a faggot OP.
>>8135373
I'm not going to pretend to be a doctor but I think you're a moron.
>>8135394
Nice argument. Completely unrelated and false statement.
>>8135373
>>Where did I even make a mistake?
Just because writing is technically correct doesn't mean its good English.
>>8135399
t. brainlet
Don't reply to me anymore until you learn proper English. By the way, ad hominems are respectable modes of argumentation; in fact, ad hominems are literally the base of argumentation.
a lot of people ITT are upset that philosophy is that high
kek
http://www.statisticbrain.com/iq-estimates-by-intended-college-major/
http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/greiq.aspx
>>8135385
I got news for you
>>8133855
>mfw new atheists think they are smarter than theologians/philosophers
>>8134590
"Average IQ by intended major"
>This graph is probably talking about the study of religion, not necessarily the practice of religion.
No shit, sherlock.
>>8136323
you're talking about a bunch of people that literally believed anything a man can imagine must be real.
you have to be borderline retarded to step over that metaphysical line.
>>8136354
>you have to be borderline retarded to step over that metaphysical line.
Citation needed.
>>8136354
they don't, that's why you are more stupid than them
>>8133812
The only reason physics/astronomy is above math is because people going into education get lumped in with pure math
Guaranteed pure math is higher than both of those
>>8136357
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument
>>8135244
>every opinion that's different than mine is biased or fallacious
>because I say so
>>8136378
Just stop, anon. Stop trying to be smart, your IQ is low, just deal with it. And stop polluting science with your baby-level philosophy.
>>8136385
Natural atheism is sort of a shibboleth for intelligence is all.
/sci/ is and always has been polluted by /pol/ blood. It's perfectly normal to find morons like yourself being happily ignored by geniuses here.
>>8136392
There you go again, trying to boost your ego. Pathetic little man.
>>8134637
>Most = majority
Is that also a legal definition? Because it sounds uncomprehendingly stupid. Almost like the word uncomprehendingly. Fuck off, would you?
>>8133971
Psychology is a bunch of women, what would you expect?
