>>8130565

This is an absolutely terrible thread, OP. Please "delete" it by opening it in its own tab, then clicking "delete" near the bottom right.

Next, push your luck by re-posting with better language, in proper English.

>>8130572
I second this

You split shit up into smaller parts until you cannot split them any further.

And now git.

>>8130565
If we can say you can create big numbers by multiplying smaller numbers... then you can take big numbers, and break them up into the smaller numbers that when you multiply make big numbers again.

This is like taking a car and breaking it up into the chassis, the engine, the wheels etc.

It's useful through all of math and Engineering as the 'parts' of something tend to have interesting properties, commonly to be cancelled out, that aren't immediately obvious from the whole. This simplifies the expression

>>8130572
How dare you! I've just finished A2-english intensive to get an opportunity for 4chan-writting. This is maybe not correct post but would you help with mistakes finding cause I see just present simple question problem in it. Please.

>>8130565
I'm not gonna bother defining a factor. The factors of 10 are 1,2,5,10.
Factorising something means to find and write its factors. Factorisation is the process of factorising. Polynomials like x^2+2x+1 have factors like (x+1)(x+1).

>>8130622
Thx for explanation! Now it's possible for me to imagine it somehow. Also maybe some of you knows easy theory of it. I mean more algebraic way of it. Interesting stories about factorgroups, rings and field.

>>8130842
Oh, it's too obvious. I meant something different.

>>8130572
Why is the word delete in quotes?

>>8130812
Lol A2 faggot. At least b1 this thread up. 6 year old natives have better grammar than you. A2 isn't shit.