How do you guys react when shit like this happens? Do you bother answering? Do you just do a 360 and walk away?
I get supertriggered all the time pls send help
>>8121538
Fuck off retard
>>8121538
>2016
>dividing by zero
>0/0 = 2
>>8121538
>How do you guys react when shit like this happens? Do you bother answering? Do you just do a 360 and walk away?
>I get supertriggered all the time pls send help
Please kill yourself.
So when taking limits, why do indeterminate forms exist though? Is this a flaw in our formalization of the calculus?
>>8121538
On the internet I always 360 and walk away,
Irl I do the same unless there is some retard who obviously doesn't know what they're talking about trying to "correct" everyone else (like the guy in your picture), In such cases I will point out that they're all wrong.
Nothing pisses me off more than people who don't know what they're talking about trying to show off.
>>8121865
It's a flaw in your understanding of calculus or the word "indeterminate."
>>8121906
Care to explain?
>11k likes
>360 and walk away
Yeah, looks like you're not much different to those fags. Go back to primary school and draw a circle. 360 degrees, rings any bell?
>>8121969
T-two pi, senpai
>>8121972
In radians, onee-chan
this is 9gag's target audience
>360 and walk away
sik b8
>>8121935
Yes.
You are retarded
>>8122216
>You are retarded
Well maybe.
To better phrase my question: if you have a cauchy sequence {x_n} (of real numbers) that converges to x, and another cauchy sequence {y_n} that converges at the same rate* to y, how can you characterize the cauchy sequence {x_n/y_n}. It seems that often (most?) of the time the limit will be x/y? When will it not be x/y? This can happen for example when x=y=0. Why does this happen?
* I'm not sure exactly how to formalize this idea either, or whether the speed of convergence actually makes a difference.
>>8122256
Mean to type
>how can you characterize the sequence {x_n/y_n}
Obviously it might not even be cauchy
>>8121797
This.
The same fallacy is shown in Spivak's Calculus book in the very first chapter about nubmer analysis.
>>8121969
he specifically said walk away. It wouldn't matter what direction he was facing.
>>8122833
Only on fucking /sci/
>>8122836
I am absolutely euphoric right now my dude
>>8122836
Or /b/...6 years ago
I literally block absolutely all of this and the people that respond to it whenever shit like this shows up in a feed.
>>8122841
>mfw people are getting triggered over the "360 and walk away" meme
Holy shit
>>8121969
it's a joke / meme, r u OK?
