[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Cellphones proven to cause cancer: http://www.wsj.com/artic
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 2
File: image.jpg (105 KB, 747x1328) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
105 KB, 747x1328
Cellphones proven to cause cancer:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/cellphone-cancer-link-found-in-government-study-1464324146
>>
feels pretty good not having a phone right about now
>>
>>8104741

How is this bad

Just let the phonefags die
>>
study: weak link, on rats.

so...
fuck off.
>>
File: 1462804180555.gif (3 MB, 240x274) Image search: [Google]
1462804180555.gif
3 MB, 240x274
>>8104741

praise the booty
>>
>>8104741
Duplicate thread, see >>8103745
>>
>>8104741
>sci today
>cellphones cause cancer but cigarettes don't
>>
>wsj.com
>references gov
>not direct gov link
>proves you didn't read the study
>Doxa detected
>Therefore:
Into the trash
>/sci/ and Doxa... all too common
>>
>>8104741
>didn't read article

Of course it has a chance to cause cancer because it gives off radiation.
>>
>>8104741
>To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In

No thanks.
>>
>>8104741

every time i see videos of police crashing into criminals' houses the female police officers have fantastic asses for some reason.
>>
>>8104741
I have read this article. A good portion of their control population died off early. You were statistically more likely to die if you were not exposed to radiation. It should also be noted that the radiation dose was incredibly large relative to what a cellphone can emit. Judge for yourself.
http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/05/26/055699.full.pdf
>>
Jesus her ass is turning me on. Source?
>>
>>8104741
Single study? No replication studies? Contradicts all previous studies? So it's almost certainly bullshit? Everyone move on. Nothing to see here.
Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.