Its probably not imbossible, but for now noone done this succesfully, so dont try this at home.

>>8100973
only if you can freeze very swiftly, otherwise the ice will tear your cells to pieces
and then if people manage to un-freeze you gently and restart your heart you will be fine

>>8100991
wouldn't that disturb the bonds in molecules?

http://www.alcor dot org/

There's a whole process where they have to drain all your blood and then pump an antifreeze through your circulatory system

>>8100996
no
unless the cell membranes are torn it must be fine

>>8100991
TEAR MY CELLS INTO PIECES

THIS IS MY ICE RESORT

I expect we'll find a way to do it in the future then discover that the people being frozen now were done wrong and can't be safely revived.

>>8101054
Are actual freezed people exists? Is it not classified as murdering?

>>8101063
They freeze them just after brain activity stops.
Search on google, cryo companies exist right now.

>>8101054
My guess is that if they find some class of non-toxic cryoprotectants, even with the current method the probability of being revived would be pretty good.

BUT this is assuming near perfect preservation conditions, ie start the procedure in the exact moment a person dies, if not before: even waiting 10 minutes after death (and the average time is more like 3 hours) can be very bad.

>>8101008
>>8101054
>>8101088
>>8101145

Current methods are total shit: http://www.brainpreservation.org/ken-hayworths-personal-response-to-mit-technology-review-article/

Then how did cavemen get conserved and unfrozen in present day?

>>8101178
>mind uploaders cult website

yeah I'm not gonna read that.