Suppose some powerful interest groups enact policies that are extremely unfavorable to older generations, is it safe to say that once they die off, their offspring would willingly accept those unfavorable polcies as "normal"?
If you doctrine new generations your twisted ideas, they can even kill people thinking they're doing something good.
North Koreans love Kim... They worship him like a god, of course it would seem normal to them
Refer to gullivers travels
Unless these policies cause the younger generations harm. This is especially the case with mass immigration, which will lead to and is causing reactionary (and perhaps even revolutionary) thought across the West in the younger generations.
>>8073837
Is this why Merkel has a 57% approval rating? Most of her support comes from younger people, especially women.
>>8073841
Because she lies and is pretending to backtrack (or her biggest lie; that they will be sent back after the war).
In any case most people only like her because the alternatives are fucking leftists, greenscum or people who are apparently Nazis for having PhDs.
People WANT TO BELIEVE.
>>8073847
And that's how fucking easy it is to influence people. Even if you pass legislation that completely fucks over the country, if you spin it the right way the younger generation will support it.
>>8073850
What scares me even more is the impact a minority of boisterous idiots can have. Influence not only on the public, but individual politicians. Remember back when it seemed like Merkel was taking a hard line stance on illegal-immigration? Her poll numbers were great. All it took was a few treacherous journalists to plant a crying girl combined with yelling loud enough and bang Merkel's political career was in danger so she buckled.
>>8073833
and westerners love democracy and can't fathom someone else liking any other form of government
>>8074260
/pol/ is FULL of shills, Australians, and Canadians.
>>8073810
>extremely unfavorable to older generations
translation: Doesn't actually affect older generations in any way besides hammering down the point that they have lost influence and control over the course of society.
>>8074268
Fatty wanna patty?
>>8073810
>unfavorable to older generations
That's unfavorable to most everyone except the targeted demographic. "Back in my day" those types of restrooms were simply called "coed" and no one really cared. Now for some reason there's a big division about them. Probably because of the whole school thing in the USA.
Also, what you are talking about is being done on a daily basis and works 100%.
When stupid people become the majority, they willfully write into law mandates that will force the smart people to bend to their will. This is the most dangerous thing anyone can allow happen. It can start simply enough, even as a joke or even as a filtering method to weed out stupid people.
Kind of like how college in the USA is utterly worthless now in determining who is smart and who is stupid. They are tuition farms and loan mills that give anyone a chance and hand them worthless degrees with little actual education. At one time, those schools failed a great deal of people and those that made it through learned what their degrees were.
Don't let stupidity become the norm. You don't want to give them that kind of power over your future.
