>Make thread about black science man discussing that transgenderism has to be real if /sci/ believes that men and women have different minds
>Some other anons agree and post studies that show that transgender people do indeed have the brain structure of the gender they believe they are
>/pol/ types come out with the most ridiculous arguments possible, "I have no counter evidence, I just believe the concept is silly and probably correlation fishing"
>If that wasn't childish enough, mods have now deleted the thread
So this is how /sci/ works. If someone posts a thread that homos are bad or whatever that becomes a 300 reply circlejerk with many anons claiming the "establishment is suppressing the truth". But here's the funny thing: When someone posts evidence for something that you don't want to believe in /sci/ deletes the thread.
If I am a "conspiritard" for saying /sci/ is suppressing alternative views then I would like to know why I regularly see racebait and anti-homosexuality threads go to 300+ replies but a pro-transgender thread got deleted after 74.
Reported :^)))
Do you have a link to those brain structure studies?
>>8073545
>make argument based on a blatantly false dichotomy in OP
>be surprised when thread is shit
>>8073545
>I would like to know why I regularly see racebait and anti-homosexuality threads go to 300+ replies but a pro-transgender thread got deleted after 74
Its quite simple really, moderation on slow boards like /sci/ is pretty hit and miss and is quite strongly dictated on how the other, more popular, boards are behaving. I remember a few months back some guy posting CP here, and those posts and that thread stayed up for a little more than a day.
>>8073545
I identify as a jet fuel, can I melt steel beams now?
>studies that show that transgender people
Transgendered people don't exist.
>>8073545
Because this board represents a small section of society that are edgy feeders compared to the general academic public. All boards on 4 Chan are inhabited largely by people who originally came to see /b/.
It's like picking the smartest red neck at Hill song conference in Texas to refute points about homosexuals. Do you really expect anything constructive?
>>8073610
>ooga booga 4chins are retards
Guess what you are.
>>8073545
>Gender is a social construct! All genders are the same!
>Transgender people behave like the opposite gender, because duh there's obviously lots of difference between the genders
Modern feminism in a nutshell
Just accept you're a degnerate with brain damage
>>8073545
Where have you been the last 12 years? Mods are always fags.
Why is Tyson so based?
>>8073687
hes not. hes a rapist
>>8073688
racist
>>8073697
no no a rapist
>>8073705
>Walter Lewin admits to diddling students
>Dindunuffin
>Neil DeGrasse Tyson gets rumours thrown at him by batshit insane SJW who has never even met him
>Rapist
Gee I wonder why /sci/ supports one but not the other?
>>8073708
> walter lewin
if he admitted to it, hes probably a rapist too then
> neil degrasse
the girl he raped was in the same class with him in college. but degrasse was a rich bitch with connections so they undermined her story by claiming she was crazy even though she's not. degrasse is a rapist and you shouldn't support rapists
>>8073713
DeGrasse din du nuffin. He good boy.
>>8073708
Walter Lewin is innocent. You can't rape over the internet.
>>8073713
This is ad hominem as fuck.
>"I can't refute anything black science man said about trannies so I will just accuse him of rape"
>>8073613
Good job proving his point
>>8073722
> defends rapists with fallacies
Rapists deserve everything they get, and you really should stop defending rapists.
>>8073724
>thanks for proving the point xD
>implying rapists cannot be based
homicide is worse than rape, and a lot of people who have committed homicide are based
therefore, i argue, that some rapists can, in fact, be based
>>8073545
The prevalence of co-morbid mental illness in transgender people is too large to be caused by "stigmatization" ergo theres a reason its thought of as one.
>>8073740
rapist detected. stop defending Neil DeRapee Tyson
>>8073747
the difference between sex and rape is literal semantics and is based on circumstantial evidence
i bet you're a virgin
The science sounds fishy
>>8073754
> justifying rape
> if you dont support rape, youre a virgin
kek
>>8073759
i eagerly await your logical counterargument
Trannies are just mentally ill fetishists who will be first in line on the day of the rope.
>>8073806
> why don't people try to debunk my retarded justification for rape
lmao
>>8073806
hahaha have you been trigger'd bro?
>>8073601
/thread
/thread
/thread
>>8073848
nope
