What's a good short combinatorics book that covers all areas of combinatorics at least to a small extent?
>>8061225
Fuck off. This is neither a homework, nor a career question thread.
>>8061228
>never bothered seeing what this link is
https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/
>>8061228
But this is a thread that could be answered in 30 seconds by reading the huge-ass sticky at the top of the board for this exact purpose.
Fuck off faggot.
>>8061225
The sticky is shit, and we all know it.
>>8061233
Wew lad, I found this after thirty seconds
https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/subjects/mathematics#TOC-Combinatronics
There's 38 blocks in ur pic related BTW...
>>8061258
Only 20 are confirmed
>>8061234
I've already read the sticky lots of times, dumb fuckwit.
>>8061217
Calm down, lads.
A Path To Combinatorics For Undergraduates by Titu Andreescu and Zuming Feng is a very thorough text, and the authors used to coach the US IMO team. A heady mix of Olympiad and undergraduate level combinatorics, all in all.
Applied Combinatorics by Alan Tucker is great if you're a computer science student, or just interested in the programming applications of combinatorics. If you want a short book however, I suggest the former.
>>8061423
Let me say it once again:
I've already read this sticky. You need to learn to perform basic logical thinking.
>>8061444
OP, just curious, why're you looking for a combinatorics textbook?
>>8061444
Like dis, master?
Modus Tollens:
If OP read took advantage of the sticky, then he would have found the book via a search.
If OP had found a book, then he would not have made a thread.
OP made a thread.
Hence, OP did not find a book.
Hence, OP did not take advantage of the sticky.
Categorical Syllogism:
All people who neglect simple solutions to their problems are faggots.
OP neglected the free ~250 page pdf on elementary combinatorics.
Hence, OP is a faggot.
Modus Ponens:
If you go on /sci/, you will find useless threads.
I went on /sci/
We can conclude I found a useless thread.
>>8061217
that is a fucked up Q*Bert level
>>8061612
False axioms lead to a false conclusion.
>If OP read took advantage of the sticky, then he would have found the book via a search.
False. Also, a priori reasoning of this kind is useless for the most part when it comes to real world situations.
>>8061238
this
>>8062239
They updated it
The wiki is now attached
