Is Science a subset of Philosophy ?
Or is Philosophy a science ?
>>8052575
Only a brainlet needs to mentally structure the world around himself in oversimplifications such as "X is a subset of Y".
>>8052575
Philosophy is dead
>Epistemology is cuck'ed by Mathematical Logic
>Ethics and Metaphysics are cuck'ed by Theology (The study of the worship of mathematical beauty)
>Natural Philosophy is cuck'ed by Mathematics
Science is philosophy.
Science is basically applied empiricism.
>>8052578
Subtle description of mathematicians
>>8052594
>he doesn't know the different meanings of "empiricism" in science and in philosophy
>>8052603
No I don't.
Enlighten me if you will. I can't imagine they are different enough to be of any consequence.
Science uses a philosophical approach to address physical problems.
i.e. The distinction op is trying to make bores me
>>8052617
Enlighten yourself, brainlet. Learn how to use google.
>>8052622
Science uses a scientific approach and not a philosophical approach. If we philosophized about "hurr durr what if reality doesn't real", then we wouldn't have any scientific progress.
>>8052633
So in other words you don't want to contribute the thread.
That's fine, but leave then.
>>8052638
I'm contributing a lot. I'm just not gonna spoonfeed brainlets.
>>8052640
>I'm contributing a lot
>Only shitposted and whined
Okay Feynman.
>>8052636
>science uses a scientific approach
Tautology. Science is the method.
>>8052636
There's an overwhelming amount of retards on this board who honestly think most philosophers subscribe to "u cannot know nuffin"-ism. This fact is supposedly based on that internet comic, or some tree falling in the forest thinf?
Science is not a concrete and well defined subject and doing science is much more than applying philosophy. They are different subjects.
It's like saying doing chemistry is applying physics or doing physics is applying math.
