Are they really that necessary?
>>8050924
Not really, and they make your boobs sag
>>8050924
nope ;^)
>>8050924
Science say no
>>8050926
Not if they're fitted properly.
Like 85% of women aren't fitted properly.
Also if you have huge boobs and want to do anything comfortably besides housewife stuff and being a fucktoy, yes they are necessary.
>>8050924
yes/no
free the tiddies
>>8050931
Wearing a bra weakens the connective tissue of your breasts, making them sag more than they otherwise would
>Anonymous 05/05/16(Thu)12:30:19 No.805093
Yeah they are pretty necessary for girls with huge tits
>>8050924
They are only necessary if you really want to have breast cancer.
>>8050924
For people who have large boobs, yeah. It hurts to walk with sacks of fat hanging off your front.
For people with smaller breast; nah, they're not necessary.
get an erection while your balls are still loose and drooping. now really go at it and smack your hands into your balls.
that is what it is like being a C cup or bigger and not bra.
are pushup bras bad for breasts? gf says they are and that they are uncomfortable
>>8051086
sounds like you want your gf to wear pushup bras you selfish fuck
seriously, if your gf says they dont feel good and they are bad, she probably doesnt want to fucking wear them
>>8051320
Pictures don't lie.
>>8051320
Why do black girls always have saggy tits?
>>8051335
>watches National Geographic once
>>8051335
They don't? Not relative to anyone else. The image implies that bras have kept the girl on the right's breasts perky.
>>8051348
>body shaming civilized women across the world using beuaty magazines isn't enough, they have to take topless models with breast implants to the heart of Africa to body shame tribal women
When will it stop!?
>>8051348
Dunno if breast implants, but i bet my ass she is not a kidfactory like the girl on the left. She must have hade like, what, 3 kids by the time the pic was taken?
>>8051320
When was this even taken? Was it seriously before color pictures or did they just do that for effect?
>>8051362
All large and/or old breasts are droopy.
>>8051363
for effect.
the white woman's jeans are modern.
black and white makes all photos classy
>>8051364
even small black girl tits are saggy. It's like their filled with half-done jello.
>>8050942
>Wearing a bra weakens the connective tissue of your breasts, making them sag more than they otherwise would
Have you seen women from cultures that go around topless?
Unless they're *very* young, they all got sad, saggy tits.
>>8051368
Maybe you should stop comparing black woman with large breasts to white women with fake breasts.
>>8051310
or she tried on only one that may have been improperly fitted?
>>8051382
i think there are other factors
bad news is tits sag. good news is delicious flat chest girls are always in need.
>>8051382
Do you mean African ones?
There are other factors also I've noticed that black girls tend to be saggier than non-black.
[spoiler]I have junglefever, I know. Trust me please[/spoiler]
>>8051363
>washed-out-style post 2000 denim that only goes up to hip
>modern belt
>on a woman
>was that before color pictures
literally autism
dude seriously
bras retard the effects of gravity somewhat. the connective tissue is more elastic in some women than others
bras also serve to keep the skin of the breast and nipple soft and sensitive. African women who go about with uncovered breasts have tougher skin that is less responsive to touch
as a side note, smaller breasts are more sensitive than large breasts. same number of nerve endings distributed across a smaller or larger surface area
>>8050942
But breasts of Western women are much less saggy than blacks' in primitive tribes, who don't wear bras and their breasts looks just like empty skin bags
>>8050924
It depends
It's kinda like doing sports in boxers vs. a jockstrap/compression shorts for men
>>8051383
Maybe you should leave your mother's basement and go look at some tits.
>>8050936
But those are sporth bh not regular so it is mostly not optimal
>>8050924
Necessary? No.
Will I kill you if you try to take mine away from me? Yes.
>>8053221
/sci/ is one of the few blueboards that gets special privileges from time to time.
We share this benefit with /his/, and formerly with /lit/.
In discussing medicine or nature (Nat Geo is nature), there's really no way around posting tits sometimes. It's education, not porn.
There is nothing NSFW about that image anyway. It's only as pornographic as you make it.
>>8053278
Global Rule 5
>All boards that default to the Yotsuba B or Burichan (blue) themes are to be considered "work safe." Violators may be temporarily banned and their posts removed. Note: Spoilered pornography or other "not safe for work" content is NOT allowed on the work safe boards.
NSFW and Pornography are not synonymous.
If my boss saw exposed tits on my computer at work he would not say "oh you are just comparing the effects of bras on the female breast"
There are no board specific rules for /sci/ that state "medicinal/nature titties are okay"
>>8051320
So much for sfw board culture
>>8053524
Mods aren't rules lawyers, they enforce the reason behind the rules more than the actual wording.
I once openly posted a diagram of futanari dick that stayed up for two weeks until the thread died of natural causes.
It's all about context.
GR5 exists to curb wanton masturbation, not to hinder real discussion. It has nothing to do with nudity at all. Posting a big tiddied girl with all her clothes on is worse than posting this.
Tasteful nudity in art, nature, and medicine has always been a gray area, especially on /sci/.
Mods are generally understanding about anything when it contributes to the discussion.
>>8053530
>go into thread about bras
>hurr I didn't think I was gonna see boobs
>>8053524
What employer allows you to browse non-work-related shit on company machines on the clock anyway?
