If I were to visualize the fourth dimension, would I be able to "see" two dimensional objects, or would they appear as one dimensional objects are to us?
I see 2 side by side 3 dimensional objects.
>checkmate geometry fags
>>8049653
>would they appear as one dimensional objects
No. In that case you'd be viewing a different plane of the third dimension as it intersects the fourth.
>>8049665
thanks I was stuck haha glad I almost got the answer right anyway, I fucking love science !
>>8049665
which calc is that
>>8049825
you
>>8049653
0+50*1-60-60*0+10
0 with anything always equal 0, so :
0*1-60-0+10
0-0+10
0+10
0
Easy peasy one two threasy.
>>8049967
...damn
>>8049653
You would visualize it as 4th dimension. Nothing more, nothing less.
And yet, why would you even want to do that? It doesn't have any application nor does it provide you with the insight into subject.
10
>>8049653
Is it fair to say that since we perceive all dimensions from 3 to 1, then a 4-dimensional observer can see all dimensions from 4 to 1?
I don't see why a dimension would disappear, it would be like you're in 3 dimensions anyways.
