You could take the word non-zero out of every sentence in which it is used and it

Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-05-04 00:13:02Post No. 8048535
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: 1421449087463[1].png (256KB, 599x387px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 00:13:02 Post No. 8048535 [Report]

You could take the word "non-zero" out of every sentence in which it is used and it wouldn't have any affect on the meaning.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 00:15:36 Post No.8048539
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 00:15:36 Post No.8048539 [Report]

>>8048535
>You could take the word out of every sentence in which it is used and it wouldn't have any affect on the meaning.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 00:18:30 Post No.8048543
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 00:18:30 Post No.8048543 [Report]

>>8048539
Fucking demolished.
/thread on the first post.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 00:20:25 Post No.8048547
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 00:20:25 Post No.8048547 [Report]

>>8048539
o shit waddup

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:34:38 Post No.8048752
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:34:38 Post No.8048752 [Report]

>>8048539

OHHHHHHHHH

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:37:53 Post No.8048761
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:37:53 Post No.8048761 [Report]

>>>8048535 [math]\frac{n}{n}=1[/math] for all values of n.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:37:58 Post No.8048762
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:37:58 Post No.8048762 [Report]

>>8048535
In a sense, OP's right. Taking non-zero out of a sentence has no effect on the meaning of the word non-zero.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:46:38 Post No.8048778
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:46:38 Post No.8048778 [Report]

>>8048762
This is the meta I can only find on /sci/.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:50:52 Post No.8048783
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:50:52 Post No.8048783 [Report]

>>8048539
OP BTFO

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:57:50 Post No.8048795
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 02:57:50 Post No.8048795 [Report]

>>8048539

fucking s a v a g e

you saw it here folks

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 21:25:29 Post No.8050534
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 21:25:29 Post No.8050534 [Report]

>>8048539

OP thoroughly dismantled.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 21:27:51 Post No.8050540
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 21:27:51 Post No.8050540 [Report]

>>8048535
> Every non-zero rational has a multiplicative inverse

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 21:43:37 Post No.8050577
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 21:43:37 Post No.8050577 [Report]

>>8048535
>>8048539

It's "effect," not "affect."

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-04 21:52:01 Post No.8050590
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-04 21:52:01 Post No.8050590 [Report]

>>8048535
>>8048539
first post likely best post