Rate my molecule.
Also, can someone figure out it's IUPAC name?
>>8044289
Oops sorry guys there shouldn't be N3 groups on the double bonded nitrogens in the ring
:^)
>>8044289
A giant ring of nitrogen that looks like what probably was in the hiroshima nukes.
I'll assume red book autism would name it: Bold & Brash
fixed
>>8044300
Should I replace the Nitrogens connecting the rings with Carbons so I can add more Azide groups like in the original?
>>8044308
yeah
>>8044313
Why op
>>8044289
>All those nitrogen bonds
>howtolevelyourlaboratory.jpg
>>8044444
SO MANY FOURS
>>8044289
I get the feeling this thing would just explode
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2-Dimethylaminoethylazide
It's not quite as batshit as OP's thing, but I found this while looking at monopropellants on Wikipedia. Apparently it was (is?) being considered as a non-carcinogenic replacement for hydrazine derivatives.
It's looks like a fucking scorpion too.
what did you just smoked,OP?
it's like 2 parallel rings i guess
>>8044444
pents speak the truth.
>>8044444
WITNESSED
>>8044289
3/10, would not fuck
>>8044289
>concentric 8-membered rings
is this even conformationally possible
>>8044289
>all those nitro groups
>probably has a VoD of 30k+ m/s
>a weapon to surprass the metal gear
>>8044792
>nitro groups
not a single one present
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azide
>>8044289
N32
>>8044744
Yeah, I'm no chemist, but I don't think atomic bonds can do that.
>>8044928
Ah ok. Carry on.
>>8044355
too much positive charge build up towards centre of ring