Does /sci/ see it?
Its saturn
I like to cross my eyes twice when looking at those
It looks like a small saturn in front of a fat one
>>8027964
crossing has strange results here.
it's made for parallel
>>8027964
If you focus right its a single saturn
>>8027968
Same thing :^)
>>8027975
It's a funny bird
>>8027975
This dinosaur
>>8027981
it's supposed to be some dinosaur
>>8027995
The face of an insect?
>>8027995
Three intersecting rings much like a celtic knot.
>>8027995
Celtic knot? Looks kinda like a bunch of rings.
>>8028006
Crosseye babby detected.
>>8028022
Spring spiral. Damn that was hard. My eyes did not like focusing on it.
>>8028022
A spiral or thick spring starting in the front left and circling clockwise to the right and back.
>>8028052
A shark facing left.
A 'lil harder now
>>8028065
Some sort of birds perched on a tree I believe. I'm having a bit of a hard time with this one. Am I wrong? I will keep trying though. I see the bottom half well but the top half gets difficult.
>>8028082
yeah, it's some vultures on a tree
>>8028091
Nifty. Perhaps my screen is too small I can only see it in two sections the top half and bottom half. I'm having trouble seeing the whole scene at once. I'll save it and look on a larger screen. Thanks.
>>8028102
Cute. An anatomically correct one would be funny with miniature cartoon hearts instead of roses.
>>8028118
yeah. I didn't make these, but I'm learning how to do them. Will look into your suggestion
>>8028140
Teapot!
.gif had me worried for a second, lol. Could you make these move or would that me too difficult for us to see them? Maybe the teapot could tip and pour tea into a cup on a saucer. I've always enjoyed these. Thanks for the ones I haven't seen.
>>8028149
After your eyes are fixed on it it's pretty to easy to follow, even if it moves.
So, I think it's possible.
Am not sure though
Last one for now, I need some sleep.
>>8028165
I see an old three mast sail boat. A schooner?
You'd have to animate the base picture which could cause a harder time seeing the "popout imagine" as your attention would be drawn back to the base.
>>8028191
That base imagine is nice. Good night, anon. Thanks for the fun.
>>8028192
>>8028195
Don't know which exact kind of boat.
I'm gonna look into the animation thing, maybe there is some way to do it.
I'm glad you enjoyed it, good night
![800px-Borromean_Rings_Illusion[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/STz3OHW.png "800px-Borromean_Rings_Illusion[1].png")
>>8027995
>>8028014
>>8028017
It's like the non-illusion version of borromean rings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borromean_rings
Anyone else with glasses get a kind of 3D effect when seeing an image with blue and red? I was reading a page on I think IR astronomy, the red and orange blobs move across the blue background when I shift my field of view a little.
>>8027969
its clearly uranus
icant see shit, what am i doing wrong
from a stereoscopic 3D rip
am i the only one who never learnt how the fuck these worked?
Geodude
>>8027955
hey beavis, you better watch out for the klingons near uranus
>>8028882
no, pirates can't either.
>>8027955
I see a ringed planet
>>8028882
How they work or how to see it?
I only see a big mess of colours, nothing more. Are you all high?
>>8028944
They are magic eye puzzles. You have to go sort of cross eyed to see the image
Only righteous Christians will understand the true nature of this image.
>>8029022
I see a dead kike on a stick
I can't see anything, i am a fucking autist or im doing something wrong ?
>>8029034
Nevermind i figured it out
>>8029034
Go cross eyed and try to focus on the image
>>8029037
How do I go cross eyed
>>8029042
Hold up a finger about a foot in front of your face and focus on the tip. Then slowly move your finger until its touching the tip of your nose, focusing on it the whole way
>>8029059
Yeah, and I find that the easiest way to do it is to go cross eyed then try to focus
>>8029062
Cross-eye is the exact opposite to parallel viewing.
These "magic" pics here are made for parallel viewing.
There are others made for crossing
>>8029063
Yes, and once again, I find that the easiest way to parallel view is to slightly cross eyed and then try to focus
My IPD is too damn small for some of these parallel-viewing ones. I can view them in negative with the crosseye-viewing technique just fine, though.
>>8029067
maybe this is a dumb idea, but what happens if you mirror it?
does it go positive when you cross?
i can't cross yet, so i can't try it
I see Saturn.
>>8029044
But then how do I change my focus to the screen again while remaining crosseyed
>>8029251
I dunno how to explain it, just keep trying and it should eventually "click"
>>8029251
You sort of relax back to being not cross eyed while trying to stare THROUGH the image
>>8027964
You just made me realize that I can do that.
I took it one step further and saw 1 in front of 2 in front of 3.
>>8029251
>But then how do I change my focus to the screen again while remaining crosseyed
Personally, I focus on my finger, and catch the image in my peripheral sight.
Well, not really peripheral, since it's right in front of me, but the same kind of thing.
Keep focusing on your finger, but just kind of notice the image.
Ive been doing these since i was a kid. I can get the shapes to pop very quickly using the cross eye method but i generally dont see details like some other anons can.
Start slightly cross eyed with your phone very close to your face, slowly move away and closer until it focuses into shape
>tfw can't see shit
>>8029360
I'll help, which image are you trying to look at?
>>8029253
>Why the fuck do they make these for parallel and not cross-eye?
That's good question, I'm wondering too.
I can't cross, for some reason it hurts so fucking much that i have to stop immediately, but parallel is fine.
>>8029251
Your brain has a sort of autofocus when it detects what it thinks is a stereo image. Once your eyes are lined up right, your brain will take over, your brain will think you're looking at an actual 3D scene but with fucked up focus, and it'll just click into place.
>>8028065
Weird, this one was, actually the easiest for me. I think the way the lines actually outlined the objects in the final 3D view really made it more robust and easier for my brain to hold on to.
:^)
>>8029404
>>8029404
perv !
>>8029405
nice cat :3
>>8029405
>>8029410
Ξ)O(Ξ
>>8029410
Please do not abuse the power to make 3d images.
>can't cross eyes
Well fuck.. is there any other way to see these?
>>8029423
crossing is wrong anyway.
try parallel viewing
>>8029423
Are you capable of looking at your nose?
If yes then you're capable of crossing your eyes.
Can you figure this one out?
>>8028877
I had to make it a bit smaller to see it. That's meant to be watched parallel, but it was too big to align properly.
Another animated one:
http://www.hidden-3d.com/index.php?id=ani_gallery&oid=&pk=96
>>8029558
If you cross your eyes rather than go parallel, it's really disorienting with this one.
>>8029675
This is not working at all.
>>8029558
what am i supposed to see here? i mean, other than a 3D view of the board
>>8029549
Parallel viewing is when you make your eyes look in the exact same direction, you can achieve this by defocusing your eyes until what you see splits, and it should all be a little blurry.
If you do this in front of a stereogram or stereographed image, then you'll get the proper effect.
>>8029679
it is for me. i see a shark swimming
>>8029558
This one is pretty sick.
Does anyone know of something that gives this effect but without crossing your eyes? I remember when I was a kid the optometrist had a small metallic plate with a noisy pattern on it and I'd see shapes jumping out of it just like in all these, but I don't recall having to do anything special to see them.
Parallel 3d a shit, crossview is where it's at
>>8029780
don't get your faggot panties in a twist just because you can't do it
>>8029789
i never said i can't do it
i said it's shitty, and it is. parallel 3d is inherently limited by your IPD and it's more difficult to do while backed away from the image, while crosseye is easier to do and can be performed at any distance from the screen and any separation between the images
>>8029794
this is true.
however, cross needs you to constantly "force" your eyes, whereas parallel is very relaxing once you got it right.
I can easily watch a whole movie with parallel, but cross starts to hurt after only a few minutes.
>>8027955
I can't see anything
>>8029869
>I can easily watch a whole movie with parallel, but cross starts to hurt after only a few minutes
you baby
i've watched whole movies in crosseye before, it's easy as shit
>>8029737
>other than a 3D view of the board
Just that. But it's pretty neat imo.
>>8029410
Hahahaha
>>8029675
That's sick
>>8028944
Make your self cross-eyed with a finger in front of your nose, then look at them. It's going to look like there are invaginations in the plane of the image.
>>8029022
Righteous Christians also have huge monitors.
>>8029660
yeah I've tried posting these webms before and usually no one can see it. I always tell them to adjust their zoom with ctrl + mousewheel but most people just don't know what I'm talking about
this one is in 24:5 aspect ratio
>for those of you with higher DPI screens
>>8030405
>I always tell them to adjust their zoom with ctrl + mousewheel but most people just don't know what I'm talking about
that's why cross-eye is the way to go, you can make it as big as you want and still get the 3d effect
>>8029410
Why are there two sets of hands?
>>8027955
old sci-fi logo?
>>8027975
Parasaurolophus
>>8027995
3 rings
>>8028022
Coily laying on his side
>>8028052
SHARK
>>8028065
umm house centipede or birds on a branch. there's too much crap for me to lock in and keep it locked constantly for some reason.
>>8028102
<3
>>8028140
Tea pot?
>>8028165
Ship
>>8028191
Lion, baboon, or furry dog.
>>8028200
<3
>>8028877
There's a bunch of porn threads with this on /b/, /s/, and /h/.
>>8029022
Jesus on the cross and for a second I thought I saw boobs.
>>8029404
>>8029405
Oh!!!
>>8029410
I was wondering when someone would post this. lol
>>8029558
I don't get anything from this other than a headache. It isn't even a correct 3D board since some of the pieces don't line up properly on the bottom.
>>8029675
Holy shit that is awesome. (swimming shark flipping its head around)
>>8030478
kek
>>8030427
>>8030429
these webms are each about 10.5 inches wide on my screen. With my eyes about 21 inches away from the monitor, I can get the images to drift together into one 3D video only after really trying for at least 15 seconds (and I'm usually really good at this).. If I tilt my head or stop focusing, I lose it. But it looks fucking glorious once I get it.
If there's one thing I hate about regular 3D, it's the glasses
>>8030638
My problem is, while I can get them to stereoscope and sync up easily, there doesn't seem to be any 3D effect.
>>8030644
that's cause there's very little 3d effect in the movie besides a few effects setpieces
How can I make one of these images?
>>8031630
They're all cross kids.
They don't realise that parallel is NOT the same as crossing and that cross gives strange results.
>>8031675
So how do you view parallel?
>>8031677
you make your right eye look at the right image and your left eye look at the left image and trick your brain into thinking both your eyes are looking at the same picture
>>8031630
notice i said
>besides a few effects setpieces
>>8031862
and I said
>there is 3D all over all of those webms
>>8031679
>>8031630
No, there's just nothing 3D in those images that really sticks out. It isn't done correctly or there's not enough for it to show up as much.
There's also 0 difference between "crossing" and "parallel" You have to cross your eyes to line them up in parallel even when you are using glasses only it makes it easier to do so wearing the glasses. Oh it sounds different but it isn't since the effect is the same thing, you turn two images into 1. You can watch an entire movie like that using both methods and see the 3D easily. It just needs to be pronounced and actually there for you to see for it to work in either one.
I've seen Prometheus in 3D with the glasses and it isn't at all very 3D which is why those clips above are terrible for 3D viewing using any method you think you need to use.
>>8031932
yeah, and you've cherrypicked the few effects setpieces in the film.
>>8029404
>>8032386
Cheerleaders? lol
>>8031935
This.
>>8031935
Yes, there is a difference.
If you cross your eyes, the left image is going into the right eye and the right image is going into the left eye.
If you parallel your eyes, the left image is going into the left eye and the right image is going into the right eye.
If you use the wrong technique, the parallax in the images will be reversed, and the stereo effect will be fucked up.
>>8028065
Vultures on a dead tree.
>>8032727
It is impossible to "parallel you eyes" with those images without 3D goggles. Do you even know what you are saying?
>>8033269
Except it is.
>>8033269
it is.
JUST
FUCKING
IT
here, I did it for you retards:
http://www.vision3d.com/3views.html
that page shows it pretty well I think
>>8032386
great ass desu
