Time

File: 1455734948133.gif (2MB, 500x278px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

2MB, 500x278px

No. Everyone in the universe has the same sense of time, and no one has ever had an issue with clocks ever, especially when moving at high speeds. No arguments here, off with you.

>>8013422
Why all the sarcasm? There could be a good discussion about all this stuff. Or did I post this in the wrong board?

>>8013408
Yes this is a well known fact.

File: t1F5R-_O.jpg (119KB, 1252x1252px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

119KB, 1252x1252px

>>8013475
Sheeeeiiiitt. I'll just go read about it sometime then. Any recommendations?

File: Read A Book.jpg (65KB, 566x480px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

65KB, 566x480px

>>8013474
What's the fucking discussion?

>Does [well-known, empirically-tested phenomenon] actually happen?
>yes, stop being a faggot and Lrn2Google

>>8013408
>Is time relative?
relative to ...?
relative to ...?

shieett, dat time peez is reluhtive to deez wrists. gol n glitz you aint know bout dis shit. my clock strikes the realm, quarter past 12, we dwelve in the cyphe of a few Ls.

>>8013408
Time itself not relative. Time observed from a certain point in space time is relative to that point.

Time travel is unitless.

>pokes head in thread.
>looks around.
>nope.

>>8014816
apparently our life is hanging by a thread.

>>8013408
How quickly it appears to pass is relative