Will this hick BEAT a fucking company at making a fusion reactor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjsSoTdpHxM&nohtml5=False
Will this engineer suck more dick than up?
>>7993892
Would a based physicsfag care to explain roughly what the mechanism for the reactor is?
>>7993892
We have fusion reactors you moron. And there's even one in construction that'll generate a net energy.
>>7993960
yeah but they dont generate more energy than it takes to power them yet,
>>7993962
That's what I said, a net energy. We don't have them yet but there's one in construction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER
>mfw waiting for ITER and men on Mars
>>7993955
This is essentially just an extremely beefed up fusor, so it's based on electrostatic confinement.
The guy in the video has claimed that he is currently working on a remote control room because apparently his fusor produced enough neutrons to give him serious radiation sickness and activate every metal tool in his shed/garage. So he had to buy all new ones.
However he has posted no data confirming this. Claims he will when he finishes his remote control room but who knows.
>>7993985
>>7993980
not that anon, but let's try with numbers
first case: they light it up but fail to sustain the reaction
energy consumed 1,000 - energy produced 100 = energy lost 900
second case: they light it up and manage to sustain the reaction
energy consumed to light it up 1,000 + energy consumed to sustain it for a day 1,000 - energy produced the first day 900 = energy lost 1,100 the first day (and 100 for every additional day)
>>7994010
That's actually incredibly cool; I was wondering why it was arcing so wildly, guess there's my answer.
>>7994013
>getting new technology to work requires an investment, be it money, energy or effort
who would've thought?
Any idea if lockheed martin fusion reaction will actually work ( they also havent released any data)
>>7994078
>they also havent released any data
they will as soon as they can prove it works
stay tuned...
f
o
r
e
v
e
r
