Is this equation... anything?
No. (next time just use a search engine)
Obligatory
>""""""""""""function""""""""""""
It's just two functions that diverge to positive and minus infinity at a growth rate of x^3.
>>7972196
I'm a fucking first year CS major in complex analysis and abstract algebra. Just thought I'd inform you that you're going to lose a job to me someday.
The limit of a function f as x approaches infinity is L if for every number M > 0 there exists a number N such that for all x>N we have that |f(x)-L| < M.
For example, the limit of cosine(x) as x approaches infinity does not exist. The limit as x approaches infinity of 1/x is zero. The limit as x approaches infinity of (1+x^-1)^x is e.
>>7972219
He was probably wondering about the questionable formatting of the limit, but go ahead and jerk yourself off, false flag
>>7972219
>trying to confuse someone with epsilon delta BS in order to appear smarter
:^), classic autism.
>>7972219
>spouting epsilon delta
>thinking that using that will help you evaluate limits
I love undergrads
>>7972219
What a prick.
>>7972316
Well, you have yo start somewhere.
>>7972350
Fuck off Stacy
>>7972463
What in the flying fuck do you think the definition of continuity is built out of if not limits?
That post even fucked up the epsilon-delta style by confusing a sequential approach (sequence of real numbers converging to x) with the delta definition for reals (any real numbers within delta of x).
>>7972194
Stackexchange says it's not even a thing.
>>7972488
Theres the open and closed set criterion.
A function is continuous if the preimage of a closed set is closed
>>7972219
I'm a CS major discrete mathematics. Minor at the top rated CS program in the US and I'm just here to tell you you're a dick and you're gonna lose a job to me one day.
>>7972219
>first year in uni
>is proud of poorly spouting hs basic crap
>>7972885
Im a Math major at the worst school in the country, and I just want to let you know
>300k starting
>you lose every job I want
>>7972488
He's using L and M instead of epsilon and delta, but you know what he meant..
>>7972885
wew lad
>>7972219
"The output of x as x goes to infinity is..."
That's how I read it, and that's just stupid.
f(x) is the same no matter what direction you're approaching it from, or else f isn't a function.
>>7972219
You're gonna lose a job to the guy with more refined social skills than you
>>7972194
>""""""""""""function""""""""""""
does the dirac delta trigger you
