OK, so I stumbled across this Quora page on the fictional "Arc Reactor" and I want to have a discussion over wether or not the science is there.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-theory-concept-behind-the-Miniature-Arc-Reactor-built-by-Tony-Stark
>>7971719
>Stark Arc Reactor
Yes or No <=> Yes
>>7971719
i doubt that any design like that will contain any plasma but if you manage to find a magical material that do i guess it`s an okay.
>>7971719
110% fucking no. There is fucking ZERO science in anything of that at all.
>>7971899
>There is fucking ZERO science in anything of that at all.
nope.It seems that they implyed that tony created a fusion reactor in a torus shape.
it is feasable but not for today.
>we don`t have materials to sustain a heat for hydrogen fusion to hapen
>it would obviusly not have that size
the germans are trying to do something like that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendelstein_7-X
>>7972120
Are you a total idiot? Nothing in the movie has anything to do with science. Do you even know what science is? I wish normies would GTFO this board.
>>7972277
do you even know what plasma confinement nuclear fusion is?
i sugest you to search for this.
and i think that this was the arc reactor.
but it obviously can`t be built.
>>7972357
>confusing movie broscience with real science
>>7972439
They tryied.
