Is genetic enhancement is humans morally permissible?
>>7970737
No, but Gorilla posting is.
>>7970745
shut up, bear poster.
>>7970737
Is letting a person have a terrible sickness the rest of their life morally permissible?
Is not letting human being make their intelligence high enough to solve the worlds problems morally permissible?
It'll happen anyway, who cares if it's "moral"
Morality doesn't inherently exist and is all subjective anyways.
>>7970737
Niggers are the scum of the earth
/s
>>7970758
I don't really think this. It's just a joke, I'm not racist
>>7970737
>Is genetic enhancement is humans morally permissible?
Yes. Also agree with >>7970753
Moreover compassion in helping our fellow humans means genes for many illnesses that killed people at an early age now instead spreads in the population.
It was estimated that a blockade 30 years from now would kill 10 percent of the population since people with diabetes, haemophilia and more would not get their critically dependent medicine. It is not morally sound to risk your entire nation.
There are more than 70 debilitating (like MS) or fatal illnesses that can be cured if we could edit certain genes.
>>7970737
Yes, I think we will kill Blacks soon.
If that is what you meant.
>>7970737
Why not?
>>7970737
test
>>7972328
Kek
