[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
is our brain deterministic?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 1
File: Claire.jpg (111 KB, 1024x1024) Image search: [Google]
Claire.jpg
111 KB, 1024x1024
is our brain deterministic?
>>
Are all physical things deterministic ? Or do interdimensional souls that are not bound to the laws of universe manipulate our brains ?
>>
Yes. We tend to generalize everything.
>>
>>7967433
your mom's pussy is.
>>
>>7967433
Who is this cot thot?
>>
>>7967433
No particular reason to think it isnt
>>
>>7967433
I always use the term causal. Is there a difference?
>>
>>7967439
Don't quantum fluctuations add uncertainity too?
>>
>>7967433
is has some built in apps
but theres a shit ton of neurons, and theres even more synapses.

the chance of getting a "crossed wire" or some sort of brain glitch only inreases as time with brain goes on.
>>
>>7969287
Negligible. Our brain is really big compared to elementary particles.
In theory, there is a level of uncertainty but it doesn't really mean anything on the macro level, so we can say it's pretty much deterministic. "Pretty much" being the key word here.
>>
>>7969297
>Negligible.
>implying we have an intimate knowledge of how a brain works.
>>
>>7969287
Its not established that quantum fluctuations are actually random
>>
>>7969308
How do you actually establish 100% that something is random?
You can be pretty much 100% certain, but never completely 100% sure.
>>
>>7969308
>Its not established that quantum fluctuations are actually random
Random isn't exactly the opposite of deterministic.
We do know that the outcome of the interaction of even two elementary particles cannot be determined by the state of the particles before the interaction.
>>
>>7967440
>We tend to generalize everything
What do you mean by this in the context of the thread?
>>
Seeing how the mechanism of neural communication is well-know, yes. However it is too complex to accurately predict, so effectively no.
Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.