>>7964602
transforming kinetic energy from wind into electric energy for other uses does change how the wind moves. have you done the math to know using it for 100% of our electricity wouldn't have an effect?

>>7964614

any change in wind patterns (not in atmosphere) seems trivial to celestial mechanics

also the guy linked a satire (think 'the onion' but for science) institute as his source

any physicists wanna pitch in?

>>7964614
Yeah Brazilians aren't particularly bright, what bothers me more is how smug that retard is.

People who don't know they are retarded are dangerous.

>>7964633
The American is obviously referring to entropy generation and resulting climate change. He linked the onion to fuck with the naive HUE.

>>7964602
Very bad. I'm in the USA and the most science people know here is "muh sugar in sulfuric acid XDxdXDxdDxD"