Hello, /sci/, no dark matter guy here again.
I use to base my hypothesis on the concept of nonsingularity. However my research revealed that singularities would not be tossed out so easily. This issue was surprisingly an easy fit into string theory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3y7sDBDK48
SSSB
You misspelled in the title.
But good luck. Make someone happy and just fucking start trying to prove the information paradox with holograms but instead of needing a computer to render the virtual image make the image as a combinatorial self referencing Mandelbrot or something. Because the Mandelbrot somehow has to render itself using it's own machinery, probably. Nonsingular? Solitary? Come on now. There are too many moving parts here to not fit plurality in with itself somewhere.
>>7958337
>No math; all qualitative
Dropped.
>>7958783
>he claims it's "an easy fit into string theory"
>probably failed his intro calc sequence and dropped out of college
top zozzles all around m80s
sage and report friends
Throw all these claims out.
The hypothesis is that mass does not cross the event horizon. Light cones close at the event horizon and every coordinate below 2GM is inverted spacetime. Light cone 'tipping' will never occur because tipping light cones cannot be reproduced in flat spacetime acceleration and thus violate equivalence. There is no mass in the singularity.
If the hypothesis is not wrong then I posit that the claims I have made regarding string theory will naturally follow along after that.
