Let's try and improve our board by posting examples of OPs who try to talk about fields science without any meaningful knowledge to support themselves. We have the /SQT/ for pleb shit.
/fit/ has the sticky that newfags can go read, to avoid cancer spreading.
If we aggregate enough examples of pop-sci plebeians, we can educate newfigs on how to post good threads.
Talking about katana blade folding seems to make many autist froth their mouth.
https://www.youtube.com/user/iamviewingurvideos/playlists
I'm trying to make playlists with least amount of pop science. If you see any bad videos let me know.
these are all good examples of critical thinking though
i prefer those threads to whiny meta threads desu
>>7950162
They're all good examples of the kind of thought processes that generally go through peoples' heads when learning about relativity.
But they all fail to finish it off with an actual physical treatment of the question which would tell them why they're wrong and teach them something.
They're also all questions which can be easily googled for thorough answer. And which have been answered time and again, even on this board.
>>7950181
>They're also all questions which can be easily googled for thorough answer. And which have been answered time and again, even on this board.
Exactly this, it's why we need to create a sticky of our own, that newfriends can read through, and see what the answer is.
>>7950094
That's kinda true. It won't go faster than light but the projection of the light on the surface after the flick will move faster than light if the surface is far enough. Imagine pointing a laser to the moon and moving it from one end to another. The pointer would cover half the diameter faster than light could.
