Are you intimidated by others knowledge?
ya
![d737bd76a59cdb82b80fe0c0dbbc5bad[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wgS8s9o.jpg "d737bd76a59cdb82b80fe0c0dbbc5bad[1].jpg")
>>7949283
kek
>>7949272
Not really. No matter how smart you are or how much you know, you're human trash like everyone else. You suffer from colds and diarrhoea. If stabbed in the neck, you die like everyone else.
>>7949272
>Hawking: Philosophy is dead
>Wow, much genius
>>7949287
smart people don't get sick or stabbed ;)
>>7949287
Very insightful.
>>7949289
>Implying Philosophy was living
Get your dank doge ass memes out of this thread.
>>7949272
No.
>My knowledge is maximum.
>>7949306
Is knowledge finite? how exactly can it have a maximum?
>>7949312
Knowledge is finite from a universal perspective, but infinite to our life span.
>>7949315
>Knowledge is finite from a universal perspective
Incredibly subjective statement. Do you really feel that you're simply a puppet to the universe?
>>7949283
Tyrants and sociopaths will find their punishment. The meek shall inherit the Earth.
>>7949326
Objective, If there are objects in the universe, each one exhibits some degree of the "knowledge element".
If you collectively look at every object in the universe then you can say that there is a finite amount of knowledge.
Knowledge however is a creation of the human mind therefore in order for it to be finite we have to look at a snapshot in time.
However, perhaps we can say that just like there is a limit to the number of colors we can see and combine, there is a limit to the number of interpretations we can have of certain knowledge elements.
>>7949342
>Knowledge however is a creation of the human mind
The universe was also a creation of the human mind, which would make your premise invalid. Prove me if I'm wrong.
>>7949342
>However, perhaps we can say that just like there is a limit to the number of colors we can see and combine, there is a limit to the number of interpretations we can have of certain knowledge elements.
What about colors not visible to the human eye?
>>7949381
kanyeposting is the worst and you should feel bad for it.
please change your ways to drakeposting or shaqposting
>>7949385
I've been doing it for years. I got more kanye pics compared to porn. I don't trust Jew rappers or fail basketball players.
>>7949394
But kanye is literally the worst black you can post. How about you Obamapost ?
>>7949342
I bet you this nigga ready to roast my ass with a thesis about 10,000 pages long that is full of inaccuracies.
>>7949402
>Obama is a white whore dressed in black.
>>7949418
watevar u do, jst st0p kanyeposting. post lance riddick instead of that gay dolphin
Are you intimidated by this?
>>7949272
Do you mean knowledge about me or knowledge about my favourite subject? In any case no.
>>7949287
This.
Does /sci/ give a fuck about others?
Do you go to university to learn or to be the best in an autistic competition?
>>7949377
You're gonna have to prove you're right first, bucko.
Scientists are intimidated by those who proclaim knowledge is relative, if accepted, the work they becomes pure fiction.
no, it makes for more interesting conversations.
A little yes. If anything I'm motivated and inspired to learn more.
The more I learn, the more I know that I don't know.
