>http://phys.org/news/2016-03-scientists-dont-thought.html
Once again, climatefags btfo
when will they learn?
climatology is not a science, it cannot even make testable predictions.
>>7948964
>climatefags btfo , they are wrong LMAO
dude,science is all about try and error
they are trying to understand,nobody is capable of being right exactly every time.
As stated above,you know science is progressing when they are proving themselves wrong.
So please stop be an idiot and appreciate it.
>>7948971
yes I do.
What I don't appreciate is using inaccurate models to predict things that are used as the scientific truth.
>scientists-dont-thought
damn that's a diss of a URL
Anyway, they try. Much of human endeavors should be interpreted as a struggle against the impossible. Like how medicine tries to save the elderly, climatology tries to make predictions about an absurdly complicated system. In both cases the people involved know success will be limited.
Hmm... That kind of existentialist talk makes me want to study the numerical solution of stiff PDEs some more.
>>7949007
exactly
thanks for making my point, because apparently it wasn't clear enough.
>>7948964
>Climatologists improve models based on better data.
>Once again, climatefags btfo
Stop.
>plants respond to warming temperatures differently than botanists thought
>bleeding cool, plant physiologists scurry to look into it further
meanwhile, on >/sci/ - Religion and Homework
>HAY GUISE THESE SCIENTISTS LEARNED SOMETHING NEW THEREFORE CLIMATOLOGY IS A MEEM XDDDDD
never change, /sci/
