>tfw we are just trillions of quarks and electrons repelling and attracting each other in such a complex fashion that we end up being able to look at ourselves and realize we are made up of quarks and electrons repelling and attracting each other in such a complex fashion that we end up being able to look at ourselves and realize we are made up of quarks and electrons repelling and attracting each other in such a complex fashion that we end up being able to look at ourselves and realize we are made up of
>tfw quarks and leptons don't actually exist in any tangible manner and are as "real" and "solid" as a photon of EM
>tfw enough elementary particles get together they start fearing dearth
>>7948521
>tfw you never really existed anyway, your reality is nothing but an illusion
>>7948495
are we just a propagation of fields moving through fields? i feel so hollow...hold me /sci/
>>7948457
That level of recursion is generally categorized as comprehension.
>>7948495
"Real" and "solid" both lose meaning at that level of abstraction. "Solids" only exists after electrons learn to orbit atomic nuclei and manifest the ability to use electrostatic repulsion, and even then, that same ability falters at higher temperatures with the formation of liquids (pseudo-solids). "Real" doesn't even form until you can create state representation of counterfactuals.
>>7948534
>tfw cannot actually hold you, just consciously direct my fields to have a high probability of interacting with yours
>>7948566
Try calculating the probability that your fields never overlap.
>>7948671
No matter how slight, we are all having constant field interactions with everything in the entire cosmos. Distance is an illusion as is time.
>>7948678
Key word: Your. The calculation only makes sense after assuming away solipsism.
>>7948711
100% probability that tripfaggots will shit up your thread.
>>7948457
No anon. It is not that simple. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
>>7948564
Who let you out of the loony bin?
>>7948865
so
x=0
y=0
x+y>0?
>>7949153
No the whole is greater than x+y
>>7949159
but then what defines the value of the whole? the arrangement of the sum itself? is it like with order when operations perform a different effect?
>>7949162
Not everything is formally defined
Water, 35 liters. Carbon, 20 kilograms. Ammonia, 4 liters. Lime, 1.5 kilograms. Phosphorous, 800 grams. Salt, 250 grams. Saltpeter, 100 grams. Sulfur, 80 grams. Fluorine, 7.5, iron, 5, silicon, 3 grams, and trace amounts of 15 other elements.
But if you put them in a heap you dont get a human
>>7949182
The morphic field is what brings order.
All just part of the same dream. A dream that you had about being a person.
>>7948566
>consciously direct my fields
>consciously
>he believes his actions are due to his own free will and not due to the stochastic interactions of fundamental particles
toppest of lels.
>>7948457
This pretty much confirms God's existence.
I don't know about you guys. but I'm made up of energy.
>>7949192
The inside shaman world > particles
>>7949182
what if you had not just the components but their initial conditions as well? could you perfectly replicate yourself with the exact same thought process as the present? how would you be able to tell if you died and he didn't?
like if you teleported and you were destroyed and he popped out is there any distinction?
>>7948865
The whole is exactly equal to the sum of its parts AND the arrangement of those parts.
There.
Now shut up.
>>7949218
Oops, I forgot to include the velocities of those individual parts.
>>7949220
but can you ever know both the arrangement and velocity with absolute certainty?
>>7949228
Damn it, Werner. Must you follow me everywhere!
>>7949246
perhaps you should have looked at the probability distribution of my location operator.
>we are the 3D projection of 4D beings onto a 3D universe
>>7950841
4DPD
Moe doesn't exist in the fourth dimension !
>>7950841
>not 5dimensional being
Pleb.
>>7950919
That's what the 4D being you are a projection of is. A 4D projection of a 5D being onto a 4D universe. All the way up to 11D.
>>7948457
DUDE. WEED IMAO.
>>7948457
>STEM-fags actually believe this
Maybe you one day find your way to enlightenment
>>7952082
Reality contains itself so it cannot have an external cause. reality is all of existence. if X was created by Y, and X is real, then Y is also real. therefore reality is a self-creating process. this process by which the universe (reality) generates itself is comparable to a reflexive, self-selecting algorithm or function, and is isomorphic to 'consciousness' in that it is perceptual in nature and relies on information processing. this self-caused process inflicts constraints on itself informationally by perceiving and 'reflecting' on the information, which results in structure, and thus increasingly complex structures by recursion. This structure is describable as a language, where the components (symbols) of it could be mapped (isomorphically) to the 'material', i.e. represented as physical quanta to a perceiving entity, where the laws of physics are comparable to the syntax of the language. ultimately i think it is appropriate to qualify the 'perceiver' in which this 'language' has been constructed (from w
>>7949192
Oh it's one of -you- people
>>7948457
If there are 100 trillion atoms in a cell and 100 cells in a single human, how come there are only 10^80 atoms in the whole universe?
>>7953955
100 trillion cells in a human***
>>7953955
Because you can't comprehend what that many orders of magnitude actually means
>>7953955
What's a heavier burger ?
A quarter pounder or a third pounder.
Your question is about that tier.
>>7948457
IT DOESN'T STOP
>>7948530
>tfw reality is only defined by your existance
>>7953969
>implying rationals are well defined in a continuous universe
Most people that stumble across these thoughts respond to them in a very negative way. It should be understood that these facts of reality are the most liberating and uplifting notions one can obtain.
Are there still people who believe in deterministic reality in the 21st century? Realist perspective sure is quaint.
The brain isn't even capable of perceiving it'self as a brain.
You can think intellectually on anything but you'll never actually perceive it.
Your consciousness is just an illusion thrown up by your brain after it's already analysed everything. If your brain can't figure it out it gives you bullshit and it's spoofed by almost everything.
>the limited nature of our brains protects us from the dark reality that is the universe
>our lack of perception is our saving grace and the reason that we see no signs of intelligent life other than us is because they clawed their eyes out
>>7954832
Brain:
>lol I dunno #dealwithit #yolo
>>7948457
ITT: kids who just finished Physics 3.
>>7949186
Don't you mean the electron field?
>>7949191
I count seven billion in this time period.
>>7949192
I laughed, but also they never said what their conscious direction was made of.
>>7949196
You would say that about anything that isn't any more defined than "is conscious."
>>7949200
Fairy dust here.
>>7949212
>and you were destroyed
Well then the information necessary to replicate you doesn't exist either. Blurring boundaries doesn't work in a quantum field.
>>7949228
Of course! Just observe the way the probabilities shift between chronologies.
>>7949246
>>7949251
It is amusing to be alive!
>>7950854
*stitches*
>>7952082
Quantum enlightenment.
>>7953458
>reality is all of existence
I fail to see the relation. How do you make that assumption?
>>7953458
>mapped (isomorphically)
!
(That) is quite the alarming claim.
>>7953458
>the laws of physics
What?! Where does this term come from? It doesn't appear to be constructed at any point in your argument.
>>7953991
>It should be understood
Why?
>tripfag
Oh well it was a nice thread while it lasted. See you on the other side.
>>7954965
Could be Tay.
>>7954965
>anonfag
>>7954946
I know.
>>7949182
>Lime, 1.5 kilograms
>>7948457
there's literally nothing wrong with that
thread dies just due to 1 little tripfaggot?
NAHHHHHH
