https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KS5XvP_rGI
don't post if you haven't watched the video through.
I want to get some opinions on it because I want to write a C program using this.
I imagine it could provide me an infinitely repeating matrix which, no matter how big the number, I can navigate through with the rules given. (±7 and ±2, ±5 and ±4, multiply, divide, mod 9 and so forth...)
But I'm not sure if it could be a 1D array or needs to be a 2D array and where the rules would need to apply (pointers or array).
this is not properly phrased but I hope you get the idea...
>>7934104
Not watching the video, you're an idiot OP. There is no "math" here to write a program with, just the ravings of a mathematically illiterate schizophrenic.
>>7934128
>Not watching the video
>>7934141
>asks for opinions
>gets BTFO
>well I don't care about your opinion
It's almost like you only want to hear things that affirm your delusions and will not listen to reason.
You're an idiot following idiots.
>>7934152
>Watch my video or you can't have an opinion on well known internet quackery, waaaaaaaah
Are you twelve?
>>7934156
besides flaming you contributed the following this thread:
>no "math"
>well known internet quackery
time to back up those claims.
>>7934128
>Knowledge of elliptical curves implies mathematical illiteracy. Kay.
>>7934165
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Vortex-based_math
>>7934177
>knowledge of elliptical curves is in vortex "math"
k
>>7934177
Saying that vortex "math" contains knowledge about elliptic curves is like saying that making donuts is about elliptic curves, except that at least donut-making produces tasty donuts, while vortex "math" has produced nothing but retarded shitposting.
>>7934178
>always posting the same retarded satirical webpage as an argument
its not
>>7934247
>not responding to the argument
Are you going to back up any of the shit YOU claim?
Posting but didnt watch the video
I'm a mad man
