Why do I have to learn this for physics? What use is rudimentary
You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math
Why do I have to learn this for physics? What use is rudimentary complex analysis going to have for a physics degree?
Pic related, an example of my work.
>>7926263
Because it's going to appear everywhere in your graduate courses.
Conformal maps/ fluid dynamics
>>7926263
Literally all of physics that is quantized
>>7926286
This.
>>7926263
>Why do I have to learn physics for a physics degree?
Just Do It fgt pls
>windows 10
>asking why you need basic complex analysis for physics
why would you even ask this question anyway?
it's math, which is basically the skeleton of physics
i would understand if you were ranting about how you had to have a certain amount of humanities hours to get a physics degree, but math?
physics is basically the science of turning word problems into math problems
if you're actually serious about this i'm worried about you
>>7926263
You don't.
>>7926263
The purpose of school is to learn facts.
The purpose of a university study is to learn to think. And the example you have is exactly that: an example of a whetstone to sharpen your mind.
Similar analysis is used in EM theory, plasma physics, thermodynamics and more.
>>7926263
> Laptop
> Ethernet cable
> Windows 10 and Firefox
Sounds like you have a lot more problems in your life than just physics
>>7926263
>browser has /v/ tab
>hurr why do i need x concept that will be required to know of in my future courses?
Your screenshot explains your retardation.
>>7926302
Unneeded. But extemely useful.
>11 posts and not one example of a physics question for which you need to be able to prove that a function ins analytic to be able to solve it or for what range of comlex variable a complex power series absolutely converges
brainlets.
>>7927376
>I cannot read the entire thread. Also I have trouble counting.
Escapee from /g/?