>P will never equal NP
>Computers will always be fundamentally bottlenecked by the lack of efficient algorithms to crack problems whose only other option is bruteforce in exponential time, which may or may not exceed the expected age of the universe to solve
>this means no hard AI oracle Gods
God damn physical limitations are depressing.
I don't feel frightened by not knowing things, I think it's much more interesting that way.
>>7922891
Shut the fuck up zombie Feynman.
>>7922886
>>7922873
>>7922889
Memers stop memeing
Memers stop memeing
Memers stop memeing
>>7922873
>another idiot CS major that doesn't even understand complexity theory
>>7922873
>mfw the Church-Turing thesis is false
the restrictions that reality gives us are what make science interesting
the fact that P =/= NP just means that people who design algorithms need to be a bit more creative and clever
you shouldn't think of it as a hindrance but rather a new challenge to be tackled
>>7922873
See it that way: at least the hard problems provide security techniques
>living in a universe that is 13 billion years old
>you will live to 100 tops
SUFFERING
>>7923942
>restrictions are cool
Get a load of this autist
>>7922873
>tfw not living in a P==NP universe where evolution surely would have stumbled onto an optimal brain design making problem solving trivial
Just set N = 1. Why do people think this is hard, again?
>>7922873
>no hard AI
So humans are magical mystery creatures from another dimension then?
ITT: CompSci Grads/Students and Futurist Fuccbois who know absolutely nothing about Model Theory, Peano Arithmetic, or Kurt Go(^..)del... test [math]1+1=3?[/math]
>>7924371
From my limited understanding P=NP would imply that anyone can be Mozart or Picasso or Shakespeare with unlimited creativity. Anyone could be a great scientists and a mathematician with unlimited problem solving capabilities. In reality we find that these people are really the exception. Like 99% people that were born were absolute nobodies.
>>7924375
>CompSci Grads
>Grads
you mean freshmen?
In the late 1800's the head of the US patent office said everything that almost everything that could be invented had already been invented. (Wasn't the actual comment but that was the understanding at the time) just a few years later we discovered a whole new world of electricity, quantum theory, relativity. ... just because you can't imagine where science could go doesn't mean there isn't something right around the corner.
>>7924439
He was right. There have been no major inventions in the last 100 years that aren't just improvements of previous inventions. Cars? Modified carriages. Planes? Modified cars. Computers? Modified calculating machines. Etc etc.
