I need ideas for a presentation for my 1st year uni math class.
I'm supposed to present a math problem using at least 1 definition, a theorem and a proof.
I asked /sci/ in the past and I know you guys got some great ideas.
>>7919334
Easy. Prove the limit of sinx/x as x approaches 0.
Definition: The definition of a limit
Theorem: Squeeze theorem
Proof: proof of sinx/x = 1 when x approaches 0
Simplest shit.
>>7919334
Present an isosceles triangle and the limit of times it can fractal into itself via ratio of 180*x! until the one of the factorings lines up over lapping eachother that create the degrees of the given factoring in both spaces of the obtuse angle that is left, when two of the degrees are switched ofc
or something like that, it's practicallity would be measuring certain spaces or phases for conductivity or purpose retrofitting
>muh programmable matter atoms stuff
>>7919351
Thanks, but we already covered that in calculus class. It should be something like perfect numbers or lucas numbers, some shit like that yo.
Cauchy's integral theorem. Not hard to learn, and very surprising result if you've never seen it before.
Definition: Modular congruence
Theorem: Fermat's Little Theorem
Hilbert's hotel
Always good fun at parties to impress math plebs.
All great ideas thanks guys
>>7919334
Show that all conics are equivalent under a complex projective change of coordinates.
I.E. in complex projective geometry, all conics are the same.
This is demonstrated in Garrity's book at the very beginning and is easily understood by a first year undergrad.
>>7919369
I've got one OP.
Prove Mr. Fractals is an obnoxious namefag who often rambles incoherently and probably has never even taken a uni math course in his life.
Proof: trivial and left to the reader. :^)
>>7919334
Euler identity?
You can either do proof through taylor expansion or by differentiation
>>7920000
it's a definition you retard not a proof
>>7919334
Do something about Markov Chains
Prove that sum (sin(x4^k)/2^k) from k=1 to infinity is not of bounded variation for any interval I, but is continuous.
Prove that Quantum systems can only have 1/2 integer or integer orbital angular momentum using Legendre polynomials
>>7920015
Eulers formula, whatever. The general case I mean.
>>7920088
OP here only thing that matters is: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK4exUaEy_g&t=2324s#"
