Is he the Newton of our time?
You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math
Is he the Newton of our time?
>>7836675
Is Newton him of his time?
>>7836675
Since he died in 1727, I guess we should call him Oldton now!
>>7836705
Autism the post
>>7836798
Oh c'mon, don't you like a good joke? Lighten up a bit! (-:
>>7836705
this was either drunk or I'm too funny
Why is he so smart /sci/?
>>7836705
>not calling him oldmegagram
>>7836675
Nope.
1. Memechizuki is not a virgin.
2. He did something significantly more advanced than babby tier calculus.
Newton was just an average guy who happened to live in a time where everyone else was retarded. Newton was NOT a genius.
>>7837007
It's this retard again.
You do realize there's no difference between the smartest people back then and now?
Btw, the majority of mathematics today couldn't derive the entirety of euclids elements from first principles like he did. Surely they should be able to, euclid is an idiot compared to people today, right? Dumb ass.
Not a dual treat QB...so no
>>7837011
My understanding of the history of mathematics is that Euclid was more of a compiler. He wrote about results other people thought up.
>still churning on quantum gravity
More like the Kelvin of our time.
>>7837065
i read a book about the history of mathematics and this is what the book said on euclids's entry.
it said he may have contributed but probably as an editor
either way probably still an amazing scientist of his time
>>7836675
Did he go out of his way to maintain a list of his sins?
Who is this nippon?
>>7839653
It's Hideo's brother, Kojima.
Unfortunately, in our time pop-sci is going to determine the next Newton. Discoveries that will put an individual on his level.
>"Solving" Dark Matter+Energy
>FTL particle/travel
>Gravitational waves (and i'm not even too sure about that one).
>Disproving the Standard Model
Discoveries that will put you above that level.
>Indefinite telomere renewal without the adverse effects.
>A fifth fundamental force
>Feasible anti-matter harvesting
>Multiversal travel
>>7839650
Why did he say "once" twice?
>>7839650
He used to post in /prog/
>>7840023
>feasible antimatter harvesting
We have known how to do that for at least 20 years, the issue remains it's not worth it without better traps. Until our traps can take bigger loads, we have no use for big globs of the stuff.
>>7836705
This made me lightly chuckle non stop for a good 5 minutes, so fucking stupid, i hate puns so fucking much holy shit
>>7840025
It's called "emphasis by repetition".
Didn't you go to school?
https://www.sophia.org/tutorials/emphasis-repetition