So what does /sci/ think, are Newtonian forces real, symmetrical

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-01-23 05:35:03 Post No. 7803529
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 51j-0zKgVaL._SX330_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (35 KB, 332x499) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-23 05:35:03 Post No. 7803529 [Report]

So what does /sci/ think, are Newtonian forces real, symmetrical and non-causal relations? Or is this view too anti-Humean to the extent that it defends the existence of forces as external relations irreducible to spatio-temporal ones?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-23 05:59:06 Post No.7803565
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-23 05:59:06 Post No.7803565 [Report]

bump?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-23 06:42:07 Post No.7803650
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-23 06:42:07 Post No.7803650 [Report]

>>7803529
>Blablabla

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-23 06:45:58 Post No.7803658
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-23 06:45:58 Post No.7803658 [Report]

>>7803529
This is sci, not philosophy. Sci only cares of the model works and predicts things. Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that is basically untestable.While metaphysics is semi-import, particularly to early physics, most 'metaphysics' of our time has to to with attempting to map mathematical assertions into the quantum world.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-23 07:29:25 Post No.7803710
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-23 07:29:25 Post No.7803710 [Report]

File: image.jpg (33 KB, 479x307) Image search: [Google]

33 KB, 479x307

>>7803529
Hey guys

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-23 16:33:10 Post No.7804352
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-23 16:33:10 Post No.7804352 [Report]

>>7803710

Metaphysics is a reach branch of study though, I don't know why you posted the EM drive