>>7801188
Shankar

>>7801188
griffiths, shankar, schaums

>>7801198
Eh I know Griffiths is shit but op should probably start with his book over shankar.

>>7801202

Why so so many people hate Griffiths? I used his books for qm and em in undergrad and thought they were OK.

>>7801204
People here shit on it because it's lower-level than most QM texts.

Griffiths is a fine book, and Griffiths -> Shankar is a fine progression if you are too inexperienced to handle working through Shankar

>>7801204
his QM book was easy af and ignored a lot of the deeper math compared to one i took in my engineering program at grad school, which is saying something

>>7801228
>i

opinion discarded

>>7801200
Definitely NOT this book lol

>>7801261
why not cuck

>>7801188
Young and Freedman - University Physics with Modern Physics
⇓
Eisberg & Resnick - Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles
⇓
Griffiths - Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
⇓
Shankar - Principles of Quantum Mechanics
⇓
Sakurai - Modern Quantum Mechanics
⇓
Peskin & Schroeder - An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
⇓
Weinberg - The Quantum Theory of Fields

You could get away with skipping everyother book