is this book good

>>7793708
>popsci
away with you, runt

>>7793708
Isn't that nerd a loop quantum gravity guy.

>>7793708
>Carlo Rovelli
DROPPED

>>7793734
>>7793741
>>7793746
so any actual constructive criticism

>>7793987
>criticism is not constructive if I dont like it
so you just want people to reaffirm you then? fine, it's amazing. the best book that exists. fuck off.

>>7793995
>popsci
>nerd guy
>DROPPED

this is not constructive criticism, fuck off

>>7793987
>>7794026
Do you understand what "constructive" means

The purpose of constructive criticism is to facilitate improvement. I can't do that considering you didn't write the book and you can't alter it.

>>7793995
do you actually believe the first three replies were constructive?
Not OP, by the way

>>7794050
fucking hell i was just asking if the book was any good you autistic freak

>>7794060
people told you it was shit and then you effectively asked us to prove it.

read the bloody book yourself if you want proof.

>>7794162
i was hoping for more insight than "Its shit"

what the fuck is your problem? do you hate actual discussion? now piss off and stop shitting up any thread you go in

File: Disarmament.gif (1MB, 360x201px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

1MB, 360x201px

>>7794202
ask amazon reviews, and go back to reddit

>>7795369
thats cute. do you feel like you fit in yet?