why do carbon based organisms breathe oxygen when there is a larger abundance of nitrogen in the atmosphere , surely it would have been a better evolutionary trait to breath nitrogen?
Oxygen is more apt at accepting electrons during metabolism, and creating a waste product of water.
>>7785554
Nitrogen is inert
Ain't no fucking with that crazy low energy bond order of 3 dinitrogen senpai. Also oxygen more electronegative easier to reduce, other reasons too but far too much to explain
>>7785554
This is bait.
Bacteria are carbon based organisms that can reduce dinitrogen to ammonia using nitrogenase. Only under anaerobic conditions though.
>>7785554
Why do organisms use chemical reactions as an energy source? Surely it would have been a better evolutionary trait to have an internal sustainable fusion reactor instead? Also, why do organisms need to be in a certain temperature range to survive? Surely it would have been a better evolutionary trait to live in all temperatures?
>>7785670
>Surely it would have been a better evolutionary trait to live in all temperatures?
certain necessary reactions happen at a determined temperature, too low temp and it wont happen, too high and you denature the proteins for example
>>7785814
>Responding to an obviously facetious remark
Are you really this fucking dumb?
>>7785820
there are no dumb questions, anon
also calm down, no need to be such an autist :^)
>>7785838
Except he didn't pose a question, he made an idiotic remark with all the knowledge of a high school biology student.
>>7785863
if youre going to be autistic about it, it was technically a question, even if it was idiotic, question nonetheless
your reacting like an asperger's ridden imbecile is not excusable, however. now go back to your anime, fucking autist
>>7785554
Why does everything have to be evolutionary? Oxygen is just better at providing what is needed for organisms than nitrogen is.
>>7786085
And organisms evolved to breathe oxygen effectively because of that