If this IQ test is so accurate, why did I score 96 on my first try and 132 on my second?
Pic related.
![butt-hurt[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/HwDjPqV.jpg "butt-hurt[1].jpg")
> the same butthurt small IQ fgt shitposting
I told you 500 times, take the official Mensa test you retard. Solving some crappy online math test won't make you a math genius either.
>>7783204
This is made by two guys from mensa, you turd.
>>7783205
I said take the OFFICIAL MENSA TEST. Are you too retarded to comprehend what you read ? it's the 501th time now.
>>7783186
It says that you're supposed to take it only once in order to achieve an accurate score
I understand why you have sub-average IQ
Next time read, you retard
>>7783186
You're not supposed to take the same test twice, brainlet.
IQ is stupid anyways. It doesn't actually mean anything. You could be a fucking genius and not know how to take the retarded ass test.
>>7783266
>a genius couldn't figure out how to take a multiple choice test
Sure, brainlet.
>>7783212
>he thinks test being taken twice is a plausible explanation for a difference over two standard deviations
>>7783186
>2000+16
>still thinks IQ tests are legit
I shiggy diggy
>>7783186
Intelligence Cannot Be Accurately Quantified
Every IQ test I've seen is a joke and none of them test very much for actual intelligence. Many questions can be rather vague with more than one answer.
There's also a major caveat. You can't make a test that has a result higher than your own intelligence. This is the same as "You can't write a character in your story who is smarter than you are." Not only that, but a test that only relies on written word on a piece of paper/screen is a terrible test.
Unless William James Sidis made the tests you are taking, they are probably shit from the get-go. IQ tests are the "What Harry Potter Character are YOU!? test" of intelligence.
>>7783512
What's your educational achievement?
>ITT: Mad low IQ brainlets
>>7783512
> Many questions can be rather vague with more than one answer.
You are %200 retarded
Fukken lel, My 14 year old bro scored 118 on the very same test you took.
>>7783544
IQ actually peaks younger than that age. If you're going to be an IQ autist, know what you're talking about at least.
>>7783515
>>7783522
People who take their internet IQ scores very seriously.
>>7783544
Your brothers IQ will be 0.7 of that when he's 21.
>>7783186
That just means that your decision making is terribly inconsistent. You just guessed all the answers, so probably your first score is too high even.
>>7783522
>tfw a question is in a field you know nearly everything about and the question itself is improperly worded so that the outcome is ambiguous.
>tfw some are pop sci questions
>tfw some are pop culture questions
Most tests are incorrectly geared towards a specific mental type which excludes many others.
>>7783568
hur dur yes i'm an eng student with a sub 96 iq, hur dur
>>7783583
>Implying engineering is automatically a high IQ field
This just means you're shit, and go to a shit school.
>>7783585
For someone that's supposedly intelligent, you extrapolate out of the furthest reaches of your ass.
>>7783186
first try is the only valid, you are retarded
>>7783596
If the test can cause a discrepancy over two SD after only 2 takes, the test is shit and IQ is worthless. It's not like I knew which answers I got wrong the first time.
>>7783570
>Most tests are incorrectly geared towards a specific mental type which excludes many others.
100% correct in regard to the OP test. It is highly specific for one mind and nothing else. It is like taking a test for a ballerina class, but on the disco dance floor you are amazing. A test for either one of those specifically don't properly determine the overall skill or in the OP test, intelligence.
>>7783186
what the fuck is the actual answer you faggots?
What test is this?
How is IQ real?
Complete a crossword in pen
If you make no mistakes, you're a fucking genius
