>"the proof of this important theorem is left as an exercise for the reader"
>f'(x) instead of df/dx
>>7768204
f' is just the "name" of the function obtained by taking the derivative. The real travesty is that you don't seem to understand the difference between a function evaluated at x and a function.
>>7768204
>df/dx
>Not [math] D _ x ^ 1 f(x)[/math]
Plebius Maximus
>>7768204
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notation_for_differentiation
Interesting article
>Lecturers who waste time on proofs that you easily could do by yourself
>>7768201
>"but the proof is beyond the scope of this book"
>>7768201
>not being able to do the simplest proofs
maybe you don't belong there. I know your type. Find another major because you won't make it.
Serre's algebra book has an exercise which simply says "pick up any book on homological algebra and prove all of the theorems without looking." I think you might just be a bitch.
>>7768627
For real? Goddamn son
>>7768627
It's Lang's book you pleb.
Keep showing your ignorance.
