Scientists from all around world do a study to find the female body shape men find most attractive. Turns out it's the figure of a girl about 13. Scientists then lie and say their study shows men prefer the figure of girls about 19.
http://egomoral.com/thinner-females-are-more-attractive/
>>7758043
>that biased site
>scientists
pick one
>>7758052
The statistics aren't biased. Nowhere in the world does a BMI of 17-20 correspond to 18-20 year olds.
>>7758054
The study doesn't say a BMI of 17-20 is the average for 18-20 year olds, it says
>a BMI of 17-20 corresponds to the average BMI of a young 18-20 year old *with maximal fertility and minimal risk of future disease*.
All that happened was a retarded blog failed at reading properly. Then you stupidly repeated the mistake by posting it here.
>>7758054
Nowhere in the world does a BMI of 17-20 correspond to 18-20 year olds.
Of course it does. Just look at the graph, the 25th percentile fits right in the 20-17 range.
All this shows is that most women do not have the most attractive body.
>>7758076
Also
>American BMI statistics
Here's you bias.
>>7758080
No, that have the same BMI than 13 year olds.
>>7758083
There's not much variation around the world. In skinny India a BMI 17-20 corresponds to average 15yr olds.
>>7758087
And so have the figures of average 13yr olds.
>>7758094
No you motherfucker, the BMI doesn't tell you shit about that. It doesn't tell you about breast size, about hips/waist ratio, it just tells you if someone is overweight or not.
>>7758080
No, these women would be tall as well as skinny, so they wouldn't look 13. Anyway, I doubt the study included 13 year olds when it had men rank women by attractiveness. So claiming that the men rating the skinniest youngest women as most attractive means that they would be attracted to 13 year olds is not supported by the study.
>>7758103
The models in the study rated the most attractive had figures closest to those of typical13yr olds. It's not complicated.
>>7758108
Do you know what is the BMI?
>>7758112
Yes, it's a measure of body mass with respect to height. It gives us an estimate of body density and shape.
In the study women with BMIs below average for adults and more like those for typical adolescents were rated the most attractive. This is yet more evidence that men generally prefer immature adolescent females over fully developed adults females.
>>7758121
how many morbidly obese kids were there in the wild 100k years ago?
>>7758043
This site gave me a good kek.
They said 17-20 BMI is the most preferred and on the only graph they supply, it corresponds to girls of 10.5 years old to 15.5 years old.
So they just throw into the article
>well, its for 18 to 20 year olds, we promise :^)
>>7758121
Except the sample did not contain any adolescent girls. The study was conducted over sexually mature women and shows that men prefer women with a BMI of adolescent girls WHEN THESE WOMEN ARE SEXUALLY MATURE.
If the study had been conducted with young girls in the sample and that the only discriminating criteria was the BMI, then might have observed a lower correlation coefficient.
>>7758135
The women rated the most attractive were the ones who had figures closest to those of adolescent girls. If the study included real adolescent girls no doubt they would have been rated most attractive. It's very simple.
>>7758140
stop justifying your pedophilia with something you can't understand.
BMI =/= body shape. A 3-year-old with a BMI of 20 will have a different body shape to a 40-year-old with a BMI of 20.
Now go back to /b/ and start a CP thread there.
>>7758140
>The women rated the most attractive were the ones who had figures closest to those of adolescent girls.
No that's not true, the women rated the most attractive were the ones with a BMI closest to those of adolescent girls.
The BMI doesn't tell you the figure of someone (breast size, hips/waist ratio, etc.), especially across age categories.
Basically, a 13yo with a BMI of 18 doesn't look like a 18yo with a BMI of 18, AT ALL. Simple as that.
>>7758108
BMI is not a measure of figure, it is a measure of weight scaled by height. an 18 year old and a 13 year old with the same BMI will have completely different figures.
>>7758140
No, the only known similarity is that they have similar BMI.
>>7758135
So 18 to 20 was the lowest ages provided for studying attractiveness? So the lowest age range was the most attractive, it suggests that the 13-15 years olds would be found more attractive.
>>7758199
>Being this retarded.
Being tighter and slimmer than a 18yo means that you don't have the same BMI than the said 18yo.
Also, no one said that young girls couldn't be attractive. But this study doesn't even talks about that.
>>7758212
Slimmer and tighter than AVERAGE 18yr olds, retard.
>>7758215
Yeah... My point still stands... Their BMI will be lower than an AVERAGE 18yo.
>>7758215
Also, claiming a 18yo on a porn site is average is completely retarded.
ITT:
People who are afraid to admit they are attracted to the average body figure of a girl who has revolved around the sun less than 18 times.
People who are not afraid to admit they are attracted to the average body figure of a girl who has revolved around the sun less than 18 times.
Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.
Well, teen porn is the most searched for online. And the teens they cast as teens are generally as close to 18 as possible and look as much below 18 as possible.
Besides, only unenlightened pleb countries have an age of consent of 18 or higher.
>>7758262
BMI 17-20?
>>7758262
14yo
Since the study didn't use such young models in the sample, we can't only use the data of the study to conclude on whether men would find this girl attractive.
That said, I'm slightly aroused.
