Yes.

>>7756772
I hope not

>>7756772
Yes, far less than someone who smokes one or more daily but more than non-smokers.

>>7756772
Possible but not probable since the use is so low. I wouldn't recommend it at any rate though.

yes if anything you should smoke more so your body is able to adjust

In theory yes as cigarettes are a carcinogen that increases the chance of getting cancer. In practise, probably not.

How bad is an average hookah session for like 45 minutes once a week.

>>7756772
>smoking one cigarette a week

There's absolutely no point.

>>7756772
Considering how old people have to be in order to actually suffer from the effects of regular smoking, it likely won't harm you in the slightest.

somewhat related to this

If you smoked just pure tobacco would that be better than a regular cig with all its additives?

>>7756877
I just do it when I'm feeling like shit, it's somewhat helpful

>>7756772
I once read somewhere that smoking one cigarette a day was good for you, but I don't remember where it was. it was probably some bullshit site like dailymail or something

>>7756877
I smoke like 3-4 cigarettes a week and have done so for like 4 years. for me it's like eating a chocolate bar, I only get a craving once in a while and those few I smoke are great

>>7756822
Basically a pack a week. Read that somewhere

>>7756921

Yes, it's better. But it's still not the greatest cuz nicotine.

>>7756978
Nicotine isn't even bad for you though, pure tobacco is probably harmless. Many of the complaints people allege against tobacco companies are usually centered on the additives that make them unhealthier.

what about snuff, is it worse/better/the same for your health?

Smoking like pack a week is less harmful than breathing with fumes and smoke polluted air