How can we advance science /sci/?
Let's advance science in this thread.
>>7739049
We'll start by removing anyone from the gene pool who thinks we can advance science in any thread on /sci/
Should be an improvement in all regards
>>7739054
>removing /sci/ from the gene pool
Why bother?
>>7739049
I propose to kill anyone who isn't a STEM major. They're a waste of resources and always try to hinder progress.
>>7739054
ayyy
http://mentalfloss.com/article/31189/10-ways-you-can-use-your-smartphone-advance-science
>>7739060
Then STEM majors wouldn't have roads, or houses, or food. Unless you make someone get a STEM degree to start farming, which seems like a waste of resources hindering potential farming time.
>>7739068
>implying scientists can't also do manual labor
>who was pol pot
Forced manual labor will build character and drive forward our glorious STEM utopia
>>7739049
December 23rd
The Lord said: “That which is not yours – put it away. Putting it away will be to your welfare and happiness. And what is not yours? Body, feeling, perception, mental constructs and consciousness are not yours. So, put them away. Putting them away will be to your welfare and happiness. It is just as if a man should gather up, burn, or do whatever he wanted with all the grass, twigs and sticks here in Jeta Grove. Would you say: ‘This man is gathering us, he is burning us, he is doing what he wants with us?’ ”
“No, Lord.”
“And why not?”
“Because they are not ourselves, they are not us.”
“Even so, body, feeling, perception, mental constructs and consciousness are not yours.”
-- S.III,34
>>7739049
>Heisenberg
>Father of quantum physics
>Not Bohr, or Schrödinger, or Dirac or even Planck
Dropped.
I can post a picture of my butt. Will that help advance science?
>agriculture isn't a science
Kill yourself cityfag
>>7739068
Botany is a science so developing a sustainable food source would be part of their job.
>>7739049
Folding@home
Any of the projects on
https://www.zooniverse.org/projects
More science communicators would help immensely.
>>7739058
Kek
>>7739635
Since studying I never loved anything so much like Diracs formalism of QM
>>7739623
I don't think anyone is going to understand what you're trying to say without some previous knowledge of at least the what the concept of the 5 khandhas stands for, Buddhanon, nor is "putting away" as a simile for relinquishment and dispassion self-evident without more context.
>>7744501
Id love to read a solid summary, any good recommendations?
>>7744546
I have read "modern QM" by Sakurai but in my opinion it's a bit over the top and you have to have got a really good/brief understanding about algebra. Other books are probably easier to grasp. I will search for better books, I have a list somewhere of others I looked into.
>>7739060
But a lot of people who go to STEM arent fit for a STEM degree.
>>7741259
Sounds like you've misunderstood what Calculus is. It's ok, it happens to the worst of us (ie. You)
