> implying consciousness isn't completely materialistic.

>>7729652
I don't debate people who are unwilling to ever consider the possibility of their own view being wrong. Philosotards are as dogmatic as they are delusional.

>>7729959
sounds like a pretty lame excuse for lack of counterarguments desu senpai

At least /lit/ is capable of having fun.

>>7729959
what about you?

>>7730010
I'm out of your epistemic paradigm.

>>7729959

I just don't argue with idiots.

I know it sounds condescending and it probably is.

My life has mildly improved since making this decision.

The hard part, of course, if labeling idiots correctly instead of just assuming everyone who disagrees with me is one.

Pretty weird how they still equate materialism with atomism.

Are you really thinking that the post is serious?

Holy shit, /sci/ is pretty autistic.

>>7730050

Are you really thinking this thread is serious?

Holy shit, /lit/ confirmed for spergs.
desu /sci/ is pretty autistic but it comes with the turf

>>7730053
Look the replies above. I'm not sure If they are trolls or they are really retarded.

>>7730058
And you'll never find out. Does this uncertainty make you feel uncomfortable?

>>7730072
yes nigga

>>7730092
ya thats autism bru

>>7730050
I can assure you, there are plenty of people on /lit/ who believe that line of thought. I should know, I'm one of them.

>>7730269
Then go back there.