why are platonic solids in biology always dangerous viruses?
You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math
We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.
why are platonic solids in biology always dangerous viruses?
>>7728887
because they're not..
>>7728894
Thats like one example bro
>>7728896
>always
thats like, one hell of an absolute qualifier, dipshit
>>7728896
There are millions upon millions of different pollen shapes. Anon could also show you images of oceanic diatoms, of which there are an untold and humanly uncountable number.
Can a biologist please respond?
And no bio molecular engineers please
>>7728906
who the fuck do you think is in your thread, asshat?
>>7728906
>And no bio molecular engineers please
Why? Don't want to see the evidence you are wrong, regarding non-viral protein structures?
>>7728912
Because this is a board of science. Not an oompa loompa staff room.
>>7728915
>this is a board of science
>don't show me any evidence from a specific field
you wouldn't know a board of science if you got hit upside the head with it
>>7728917
> if you got hit upside the head with it
>engineer
I like it when you people make your own dick jokes.
>>7728921
ENGINEERS BTFO