Ok /sci/, the year is 2016 and the sun is going to collide with the earth. Luckily you've been selected to live in a bunker with enough food/water/air for 20 years (about how long the earth would be uninhabitable) after which you will emerge and you'll be charged with helping to rebuild society.
You can take 2 books containing all known scientific discoveries of any given subject, the rest will be lost, what do you take and why?
>>7719052
If you take your book on astrophysics, you would notice that it's impossible for anyone on Earth to survive a collision with the sun inside a bunker.
That being said, Medicine is a given. And maybe Engineering? I don't know.
>>7719052
Playboy mag and...
Actually just go ahead and make that 2 nudie mags.
>>7719052
Aerospace engineering book
and
medical books
You cant survive a collision with the sun.
IF EARTH is off orbit then other planets might become habitable. Fly there instead.
>>7719052
Why exactly couldn't you take a micro SD card?
>>7719069
Engineering isn't science.
>>7719052
Materials science - chemistry and geology biased
Medicine - general life sciences biased
>>7719095
the collision would fuck with the electrical systems too much so why would you want to
>all these people not recognizing this pasta
come on now
>>7719052
Rebuilding Societies for Dummies volume I
Rebuilding Societies for Dummies volume II
1) Hatcher, Algebraic Topology
2) Folland, Real Analysis (2nd edition)
If I'm required to choose science textbooks then I'd rather just die in the fire.
wouldnt that be useless because you preserved higher order topics but not the foundations they're built on
>>7719052
1) The Bible
2) Summa Theologica
>>7719165
You choose a book filed with typos, pleb.
>>7719276
fuck you retard
