If Mars had never lost it's magnetic field, would it be the second habitable/inhabited world besides earth?
>>7705824
Maybe. But from what we know a solar system can not have more than one habitable planet in it.
>>7705839
Why not?
>>7705839
Dubious.
>>7705839
>a solar system can not have more than one habitable planet in it.
What the fuck am I reading
>>7705839
kek
>>7705839
Says who?
Habitable zones are generally large enough to host many planets. Mars is in the habitable zone for example, but didn't really got to take off due to loss of the magnetic field in the first few hundred million years after it's birth allowing the very frequent and more powerful solar winds of then far more active sun to blast off the atmosphere.
>>7705839
Not sure if b8 but thats pretty retarded anon.
Anyways, didnt mars lose its magnetic field because its fuckin' tiny?
>>7705824
>>7705824
>>7705824
>>7705824
What we need to create is an total underground gravity device in order to first simulate our gravity, then global wise T beams to sustain the artificial atmosphere. And after closed enviroment is certain, trees must be planted to create after 1000 years a natural enviroment.
>>7705824
Mars had a magnetic field?
>>7705874
>underground gravity device
>T beams
>planting trees
All this needs is some jet fuel and we've got ourselves a new meme
>>7705863
Habitable zones are something of a myth. Earth is actually outside Sol's "habitable zone", we have biofeedback loops and geothermal heating (itself lubricated by life) that makes up the difference. A world like Neptune is way outside any kind of habitable zone, yet it may contain most of the solar system's life in gigantic global oceans. Europa is only a moon and again way too far out, but tidal forces from its giant primary heat it enough to have vast global oceans too.
>>7705915
if you are a very big slavemaster with a very big whip, you can advocate means, for it is not a meme but a grand imagination
Well, it's definitely a possibility, but as for life here on our planet, we may or may not be able to survive there. And then Olympus Mons is also a worrisome element in the planets possible habitability.
>>7705824
Venus is a more likely candidate.
>>7706019
If only it spun...
>>7706032
If it hadn't lost its magnetic field, there is a good chance it would still have spin.
These phenomena are probably related, though probably not in the manner you are thinking.
>>7705874
One of these installed on top of mons olympus would allow mars to spin up its own mag field
>>7706062
Is this a bait? or are you retarded? Do you even know what generates a magnetic field?
>>7706062
A monumental collision caused it to lose its spin, not the fact that it's missing a magnetic field. Mars has no magnetic field and it's day is the same length as ours
>>7705866
>Anyways, didnt mars lose its magnetic field because its fuckin' tiny?
No moon, so the core doesn't rotate.
