What does /sci/ think of MolView? Is there a better molecule editor/viewer I can use?
>>7701617
It's not part of blueobelisk....
But it's GNU PUBLIC LISCENSE, so it's allright! I'll have to check it out. Personally I use avogadro. Nanoengineer is pretty cool too, but I can't get the GUI to work on GNU\Linux.
What is that monstrosity?
>>7701639
It was me attempted to build a polypeptide from scratch... Things didn't go well and it ended fusing with two other peptide chains by mistake(The bonds were too close to eachother.)
>>7701617
ChemDraw maybe ?
>>7701639
Just looked up the SMILES for it--
C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(=O)[N+]([H])[H])C1C=CC(O[H])=CC=1)=O)CCCN([H])C(N([H])[H])N([H])[H])=O)CCC(C)O[H])=O)C)=O)CCC(O[H])C)=O)C1C=CC(O[H])=CC=1)=O)CCCN([H])C(N([H])[H])N([H])[H])=O)CCC(C)O[H])=O)(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C(C(N([H])C([O-])=O)C1C=CC(O[H])=CC=1)=O)CCC(C)O[H])=O)C)=O)CCC(OC(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C([N+]([H])[H])=O)OCC(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(C(N(C(=O)[O-])[H])C1=CC=C(O[H])C=C1)=O)[H])C)=O)[H])C(CC(C)=O)O[H])=O)[H])CC(O[H])N([H])[H])=O)[H])CO[H])=O)[H])C1=CC=C(O[H])C=C1)=O)[H])C)=O)[H])C(CC(C)=O)O[H])=O)[H])CC(N([H])[H])O[H])=O)[H])CO[H])=O)[H])C1=CC=C(O[H])C=C1)=O)[H])C)=O)[H])C(CC(=O)C)O[H])=O)[H])CC(N([H])[H])O[H])=O)[H])CO[H])=O)[H])C1=CC=C(O[H])C=C1)=O)[H])C)=O)[H])C(CC(C)=O)O[H])=O)[H])CC(O[H])N([H])[H])=O)[H])CO[H])=O)[H])C1=CC=C(O[H])C=C1)=O)[H])C)=O)[H])C(CC(C)=O)O[H])=O)[H])CC(N([H])[H])O[H])=O)[H])CO[H])=O)[H])C1=CC=C(O[H])C=C1)=O)[H])C)=O)[H])C(CC(C)=O)O[H])=O)[H])CC(O[H])N([H])[H])=O)[H])CO[H])=O)[H])C1=CC=C(O[H])C=C1)=O)[H])C)=O)[H])C(CC(C)=O)O[H])=O)[H])CC(O[H])N([H])[H])=O)[H])C(=O)N(C(C1=CC=C(O[H])C=C1)C(=O)N(C(C)C(=O)N(C(C(CC(C)=O)O[H])C(=O)[N+]([H])[H])[H])[H])[H])[H])=O)CCC(O[H])C)[H])=O)CO[H])[H])=O)C(O[H])C)[H])=O)N([H])C(C(N([H])C([O-])=O)C)=O)C)C)=O)CCCN([H])C(N([H])[H])N([H])[H])=O)C1C=CC(O[H])=CC=1)=O)CCC(O[H])C)=O)C
>>7701644
Why would you do that? Why not just type in the amino acid sequence and call it a day?
>>7701666
nice get. Now make something with more than 100 nested ring closures. Most SMILES parsers can't handle this much.
>>7701669
I was bored, and as far as I know, the only way to actually get/build molecules in Molview is to physically put the bonds in place. Sometimes it gets a little fucky and ends up messing with everything.
Chemdraw is cool
Heh, shit's fucked up senpai.
Huh, it's got Jmol, GLmol, and Chemdoodle.
Thanks for posting this OP, will use in future.
>>7702568
Is that an amino acid polymer in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?
>>7702596
peptide.. it's a peptide.
>>7701617
I like PyMol
>>7701639
Curious about that diagram - what do the ellipses, diamonds and rectangles represent?
Some are apps, some are software libraries, but beyond that I can't tell specifically how to read this chart...
>>7701617
I used VMD, and NAMD. Free software from UIUC.
Though, I've never used MolView, and VMD took me some time to learn how to use properly.
>>7705487
4u
VMD is what I use also.
Render it with built in Tachyon renderer and you have publication quality material
Am I peasant if I only know Gaussview?
>>7701816
I think it's the best possibility, Avogadro is good enough (though I don't remember if it can give names to structures).
HOW'S my benzene ring bros???//
HOW'S my benzene ring bros???//>>7705587
FORGOT PIC
>>7705487
It's all the projects of the Blue Obelisk: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Obelisk
They fight for your freedom
