Customize your cookie preferences

We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.

We use cookies on our site to enhance your user experience, provide personalized content, and analyze our traffic.

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
If e^(pi*i) is 0 then why cant we divide by 0?

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 1
File: steve-urkel-costume-1.jpg (46 KB, 220x271) Image search: [Google]
steve-urkel-costume-1.jpg
46 KB, 220x271
If e^(pi*i) is 0 then why cant we divide by 0?
>>
If x - x = 0 then why can't we divide by 0?
>>
Are you some sort of retard? You can divide by zero. You just don't because you're a coward. Find some sensibility in your fear of quantum dynamics but you will never be at peace.
>>
Good shit sci. Noone even noticed that e^(ipi) is in fact equal to negative 1. Jesus christ.
>>
>>7693602

Beat me to it. e^(i * pi) = -1 , or e^(i * tau) = 1 if you don't like negative numbers.
>>
>>7693404
Prove why you can divide by zero, and I'll give you a million dollar, field medal, and a tenure track position at a top 10 global university. By the way those are the prizes for dividing by zero. Its a real thing.
>>
>>7693665
Lul
>>
>>7693665
You do know that not dividing by zero is just a convention because it makes things behave nicely, right?
>>
>>7693404
e^(pi*i) is -1 dumbass
>>
Can we...
e^(pi*i)=x
lnx=pi*i
lnx^(2)=pi^(2)*i^(2)
lnx^(2)=pi^(2)*-1
lnx^(2)^(2)=pi^(2)^(2)*-1^(2)
lnx^(4)=pi^(4)*1
lnx^(4)=pi^(4)
lnx=pi
Can we do that?
>>
>>7695430

>taking the natural logarithm of a negative value

'fraid not senpai
>>
>>7693781
It can be proven that the additive identity in any field does not have a multiplicative inverse.
Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 1

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at imagescucc@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK